...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ayub Medical College >COMPARISON OF PERITONEAL CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE DURING CAESAREAN SECTION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF PERITONEAL CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE DURING CAESAREAN SECTION

机译:剖腹产时腹膜关闭与非关闭的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: In modern obstetrics caesarean sections are commonly used and in all caesarean sections either peritoneal closure is done or not. This cases series was conducted to record outcomes in our setup. Methods: Cases of caesarean sections were followed for adhesions and non-adhesions in peritoneal closure and non-closure cases from 1 st January to December 2011 at DHQ Hospital Haripur. In non-peritoneal closure cases adhesions were marked as compare to non-adhesions in peritoneal closure cases. Results: Sixty-five cases of peritoneal closure and 30 cases of non-peritoneal closure were followed up. There were more cases of adhesions in non-closure group ( p 0.05). Conclusion: Peritoneal closure is beneficial in routine caesarean sections. Keywords: Adhesions, Caesarean sections, peritoneal closure, peritoneal non closure
机译:背景:在现代产科中,通常采用剖腹产,而在所有剖腹产中均进行或不进行腹膜封闭。进行该案例系列以记录我们设置中的结果。方法:于2011年1月1日至12月在哈里普尔DHQ医院随访剖腹产患者的腹膜闭合和非闭合情况下的粘连和不粘连。在非腹膜闭合病例中,与在腹膜闭合病例中的非粘连相比,其粘着性明显。结果:随访65例腹膜闭合和30例非腹膜闭合。非闭合组粘连的病例更多(p <0.05)。结论:腹膜封闭在常规剖宫产中是有益的。关键字:粘连,剖腹产,腹膜闭合,腹膜非闭合

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号