首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Protection >Comparison of Pine Needles and Mosses as Bio-Indicators for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
【24h】

Comparison of Pine Needles and Mosses as Bio-Indicators for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

机译:松针和苔藓作为多环芳烃生物指标的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental contaminants known to be hazardous to human health. Pine needles and mosses are useful bio-indicators for assessing PAH pollutions; however, the differences in their PAH uptake mechanisms have not been sufficiently discussed. In this study, the properties of pine needles and mosses as bio-indicators of PAHs were investigated on the basis of differences in their PAH profiles. Five sets each of pine needle and moss samples were collected from circular sampling plots and analyzed for 16 PAHs. A comparison of PAH profiles revealed that the proportion of lower molecular weight PAHs (2 - 3 aromatic rings; LMW PAHs) was significantly higher in pine needles (78.5% ± 4.8%) than in mosses (35.4% ± 6.8%). In contrast, the proportion of higher molecular weight PAHs (5 - 6 aromatic rings; HMW PAHs) was lower in pine needles (4.3% ± 2.9%) than in mosses (25.1% ± 3.3%). Further, the combination of PAH isomer ratios showed that PAH sources between pine needles and mosses were not the same. These differences were explained by their uptake mechanisms and partly by the absorption of PAHs from soil particles by mosses. These findings indicate that pine needles are useful for assessing airborne LMW PAH pollution, whereas mosses can be integrated indicators for assessing complex HMW PAH pollution of the atmospheric and soil environments. On the basis of these properties, the usefulness of these bio-indicators should also be evaluated according to the objective of the assessment and the areas where they are applied.
机译:多环芳烃(PAH)是普遍存在的对人类健康有害的环境污染物。松针和苔藓是评估PAH污染的有用生物指示剂。然而,他们对PAH吸收机制的差异还没有得到足够的讨论。在这项研究中,基于PAHs的差异,研究了松针和苔藓作为PAHs生物指示剂的特性。从圆形采样区收集了五组松针和苔藓样品,并分析了16种PAH。 PAH分布图的比较表明,松针中较低分子量PAHs(2-3个芳香环; LMW PAHs)的比例(78.5 %±4.8 %)显着高于苔藓中(35.4 %±6.8 %)的比例)。相比之下,松针中较高分子量的PAHs(5-6个芳香环; HMW PAHs)的比例(4.3%%±2.9%)低于苔藓中的(25.1% 3.3%)。此外,PAH异构体比例的组合显示,松针和苔藓之间的PAH来源不同。这些差异可以通过其吸收机制来解释,部分可以通过苔藓从土壤颗粒中吸收多环芳烃来解释。这些发现表明,松针可用于评估机载LMW PAH污染,而苔藓可作为评估大气和土壤环境中复杂HMW PAH污染的综合指标。基于这些特性,还应根据评估的目的和应用领域来评估这些生物指标的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号