首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Protection >A Note: De-Growth Debate and New Scientific Analysis of Economic Growth
【24h】

A Note: De-Growth Debate and New Scientific Analysis of Economic Growth

机译:笔记:反增长辩论与经济增长的新科学分析

获取原文
           

摘要

This article is a theoretical note on de-growth debate. The article includes an analysis of economic growth and alternative growth paths. The article is focused on the concepts of de-linking, re-linking and de-growth. We connected linking analysis (de-linking and re-linking) analytically to the de-growth debate. On the basis of our framework, special cases of de-growth in the linking process relate to strong re-linking, weak re-linking and recessive de-linking. This kind of theoretical approach helps us to define the special nature of de-growth. Key finding of us is that only the de-growth case of recessive de-linking meets the condition of environmental sustainability. However, this case does not fulfil the criteria of sustainable development defined in the WCSD context. In the linking process, the WCSD conditions of sustainable development are met in the strong de-linking process only. In our analytical framework, the theoretical concepts of de-growth and sustainable development seem to conflict by definition.
机译:本文是有关减少增长辩论的理论说明。本文包括对经济增长和替代增长路径的分析。本文重点介绍了取消链接,重新链接和取消增长的概念。我们通过分析将链接分析(去链接和重新链接)与去增长辩论联系起来。在我们的框架的基础上,链接过程中增长不足的特殊情况与强重新链接,弱重新链接和隐性取消链接有关。这种理论方法可以帮助我们定义增长的特殊性质。我们的主要发现是,只有隐性脱链的增长情况才符合环境可持续性的条件。但是,该案例不符合WCSD上下文中定义的可持续发展标准。在链接过程中,仅通过强大的去链接过程才能满足WCSD可持续发展的条件。在我们的分析框架中,关于增长和可持续发展的理论概念从定义上似乎是矛盾的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号