...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society >The Management of Bilateral Interfacetal Dislocation with Anterior Fixation in Cervical Spine : Comparison with Combined Antero-Posterior Fixation
【24h】

The Management of Bilateral Interfacetal Dislocation with Anterior Fixation in Cervical Spine : Comparison with Combined Antero-Posterior Fixation

机译:颈椎前路固定的双侧界面脱位的治疗:与前后路联合固定的比较

获取原文

摘要

Objective Combined antero-posterior fixation has been a standard method for bilateral interfacetal dislocation in cervical spine. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and complication of anterior cervical stabilization in treatment of bilateral interfacetal dislocation. Methods A total of 65 cases of traumatic bilateral interfacetal dislocation in cervical spine who were managed in our institution, from Mar. 1997 to Feb. 2006, were included in this study. Closed reduction was tried in all cases before operation. If closed reduction was accomplished successfully, only anterior cervical fixation was performed (Group I), and attempted to place screws bicortically as possible with unicortical screws. If failed, posterior open reduction with fixation was first tried, followed by anterior cervical fixation (Group II). All patients were evaluated for neurological outcome and radiological evidence of healing. Results The Group I included 47 patients and the Group II, 18 patients. The improvement of Frankel grade and increase of mean cervical lordosis angles were not statistically different between two groups. Screw-plate system used did not influence the outcome. On follow up, solid bone fusion was evident and there were no cases of instability in both groups. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that anterior cervical fixation on BID is safe and effective in comparison with combined antero-posterior cervical fixation.
机译:目的前后路联合固定术已成为颈椎双侧界面脱位的标准方法。这项研究的目的是评估前路颈椎稳定术治疗双侧界面脱位的疗效和并发症。方法回顾性分析1997年3月至2006年2月在我院收治的65例颈椎创伤性双侧交界面脱位的病例。手术前在所有情况下均尝试密闭复位。如果成功完成闭合复位术,则仅进行颈椎前路固定(I组),并尝试使用单皮质螺钉尽可能将螺钉固定在两头。如果失败,首先尝试使用后路固定复位术,然后进行前路颈椎固定术(II组)。对所有患者进行神经系统预后评估和放射学治愈证据。结果第一组包括47例患者,第二组包括18例患者。两组之间Frankel评分的改善和平均颈椎前凸角的增加在统计学上没有差异。使用的螺丝钉板系统不影响结果。随访中,可见明显的骨融合,两组均未出现不稳定的情况。结论我们的研究表明,与颈椎前后路联合固定术相比,BID颈椎前路固定术是安全有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号