首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Kathmandu Medical College >Double J stenting compared with ureteral catheterization in percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
【24h】

Double J stenting compared with ureteral catheterization in percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

机译:经皮肾镜取石术中双J支架置入术与输尿管插管术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Nephrolithiasis represents a large portion in the field of Urological pathology. Minimal invasive and non-invasive therapies have become more accessible and efficient in the treatment of nephrolithiasis. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective minimal invasive modality of treating kidney stones.Objectives: To evaluate the outcome of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using two different stenting techniques i.e. externalized ureteral catheter placement compared with Double-J stent placement.Methods: This is a prospective study conducted from January 2012 to June 2013 at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital among patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Fifty patients who underwent PCNL were divided into two equal groups: Group 1 (PCNL with Double-J stent placement) and Group 2 (PCNL with externalized ureteral catheter placement). Factors evaluated included stent-related symptoms, postoperative morbidity, and the cost. Morbidity was classified according to the Modified Clavien classification. SPSS 20 was used for statistical evaluation. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.Results: Stent related morbidity were fever, dysuria, hematuria, burning micturition. Total of 16 stent related complications were seen in group 1 with four of the patients needing early surgical intervention to remove the Double J stent and injectable antibiotics for urinary tract complication due to in dwelling stent. In Group 2, seven patients experienced postoperative complications, out of which six were managed conservatively and one patient had grade III A dysuria and hematuria, who underwent immediate stent removal and received injectable antibiotics. There was no reported sepsis and mortality in both groups. Stent was removed in 3-4 weeks’ time in group 1 and 3-4 days in group 2. In Group 1, patients had to come one day prior for stent removal. Cost for DJ stent was significantly higher in group I than group II.Conclusion: Standard PCNL with externalized ureteral catheter is as feasible as Double-J stenting. Less cost can be a huge relief to the patients in the third world developing country.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v3i2.11228Journal of Kathmandu Medical CollegeVol. 3, No. 2, Issue 8, Apr.-Jun., 2014Page : 63-67
机译:背景:肾结石症占泌尿外科病理学领域的很大一部分。最小的侵入性和非侵入性疗法在肾结石的治疗中变得更容易获得和有效。经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗肾结石的一种有效的微创方法。目的:使用两种不同的支架置入技术(即外置输尿管导管置入术与Double-J支架置入术),评估标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的疗效。是一项于2012年1月至2013年6月在加德满都医学院教学医院对接受经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的患者进行的前瞻性研究。将50例行PCNL的患者分为两组:第一组(使用Double-J支架置入的PCNL)和第二组(外部输尿管置入的PCNL)。评估的因素包括支架相关症状,术后发病率和费用。根据改良的Clavien分类对发病率进行分类。 SPSS 20用于统计评估。 P值小于0.05被认为是显着的。结果:与支架相关的发病是发烧,排尿困难,血尿,排尿灼热。在第1组中总共观察到16种与支架相关的并发症,其中有4位患者需要早期手术干预,以除去Double J支架和由于留置支架而导致的尿路并发症注射用抗生素。在第2组中,有7例患者发生了术后并发症,其中6例接受了保守治疗,另外1例具有IIIA级尿痛和血尿的患者接受了立即的支架拆除并接受了可注射的抗生素治疗。两组均未报告败血症和死亡率。在第1组中,需要在3-4周内移除支架,在第2组中,则需要在3-4天内移除支架。在第1组中,患者必须在支架移除前一天进行手术。 I组DJ支架的费用明显高于II组。结论:标准PCNL配外置输尿管导管与Double-J支架一样可行。成本降低可以极大地减轻第三世界发展中国家的患者的痛苦。DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v3i2.11228加德满都医学院学报2014年4月6日,第2卷第3期,第63-67页

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号