首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Cardiac Output Measurement by Arterial Waveform Analysis in Cardiac Surgery – a Comparison of Measurements Derived from Waveforms of the Radial Artery versus the Ascending Aorta
【24h】

Cardiac Output Measurement by Arterial Waveform Analysis in Cardiac Surgery – a Comparison of Measurements Derived from Waveforms of the Radial Artery versus the Ascending Aorta

机译:在心脏外科手术中通过动脉波形分析进行心输出量测量– from动脉与升主动脉波形的测量结果进行比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In cardiac surgery, perioperative haemodynamic management is often guided by cardiac output (CO) measurements. The Vigileo? monitor offers uncalibrated CO measurement by arterial waveform analysis (COwave). This validation study compared CO measurements derived from radial artery waveform analysis with those derived from the ascending aorta. CO measurements from the radial artery versus the ascending aorta showed a significant correlation before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, Bland–Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.1 l/min and 0.1 l/min, and limits of agreement (LOA) of +2.2 l/min and ?1.9 l/min prior to CPB, and +2.5 l/min and ?2.7 l/min after weaning from CPB. A comparison of these CO measurements showed a low mean bias, but wide LOA before and after CPB. Therefore measurements using uncalibrated COwave have to be interpreted with caution in a clinical situation.
机译:在心脏外科手术中,围手术期血液动力学管理通常由心输出量(CO)测量指导。维吉利奥?监护仪通过动脉波形分析(COwave)提供未校准的CO测量。该验证研究将compared动脉波形分析得出的CO测量值与升主动脉得出的CO测量值进行了比较。 the动脉与升主动脉的CO测量值显示了体外循环(CPB)前后的显着相关性。但是,布兰德-奥尔特曼分析显示,平均偏差为0.1 l / min和0.1 l / min,在CPB之前的一致性极限(LOA)为+2.2 l / min和1.9 L / min,而+2.5 l / min从CPB断奶后约2.7 l / min。这些CO测量值的比较显示,CPB前后平均偏倚较低,但LOA较宽。因此,在临床情况下,必须谨慎解释使用未校准的COwave进行的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号