首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology >“Is powered toothbrush better than manual toothbrush in removing dental plaque?” – A crossover randomized double-blind study among differently abled, India
【24h】

“Is powered toothbrush better than manual toothbrush in removing dental plaque?” – A crossover randomized double-blind study among differently abled, India

机译:“电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面是否比手动牙刷好?” –在能力不同的印度之间进行的一项交叉随机双盲研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Although mechanical plaque removal is an effective method, powered toothbrushes are specially designed to benefit differently abled. Literature comparing plaque removal efficacy between manual and powered toothbrushes among differently abled is sparse. Study Design and Setting: A cross-over, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in differently abled institution. Materials and Methods: Twenty differently abled participants were randomly assigned to two groups of ten participants. Plaque removal efficacy of battery-operated powered toothbrush was compared with manual toothbrush in a single brushing on the 8th day. After a washout of 1 week, groups were switched. Assessment of plaque scores was done using Turesky's modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index. Statistical Analysis: Difference in plaque score between pre- and post-brushing in each group was compared using paired sample t-test. Results: In the pooled data analysis combining the results of Phase I and II, mean pre- and post-brushing plaque scores with manual toothbrush was 2.26 ± 0.4 and 1.93 ± 0.5, respectively, while with powered toothbrush, it was 2.21 ± 0.4 and 1.96 ± 0.4, respectively. However, difference in mean plaque reduction between manual and powered toothbrushes was not significant. Conclusion: Manual toothbrushes were equally effective compared to powered toothbrushes. Long-term studies precisely documenting cost-effectiveness and participant perception in the ease of use are recommended to validate our results.
机译:背景:尽管去除机械菌斑是一种有效的方法,但电动牙刷还是经过专门设计的,可以使不同能力的患者受益。比较能力不同的手动牙刷和电动牙刷之间去除牙菌斑功效的文献很少。研究设计与设置:在能力不同的机构中进行了一项交叉,随机,双盲研究。材料和方法:将20名能力不同的参与者随机分配给10名参与者组成的两组。在第8天的单次刷牙中比较了电动牙刷与手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。冲洗1周后,切换组。使用Turesky's Quigley-Hein斑块指数的修改对斑块评分进行评估。统计分析:使用配对样本t检验比较每组刷前和刷后牙菌斑得分的差异。结果:在结合第一阶段和第二阶段结果的汇总数据分析中,手动牙刷在刷牙前后的平均牙菌斑得分分别为2.26±0.4和1.93±0.5,而电动牙刷分别为2.21±0.4和分别为1.96±0.4。但是,手动和电动牙刷的平均牙菌斑减少量差异不明显。结论:手动牙刷与电动牙刷相比具有同等效力。建议长期研究精确记录成本效益和参与者对易用性的看法,以验证我们的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号