首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Language Modelling >Scope ambiguities, monads and strengths
【24h】

Scope ambiguities, monads and strengths

机译:范围含糊,单子和优点

获取原文
       

摘要

In this paper, we will discuss three semantically distinct scope assignment strategies: traditional movement strategy, polyadic approach, and continuation-based approach. As a generalized quantifier on a set X is an element of C(X), the value of continuation monad C on X, in all three approaches QPs are interpreted as C-computations. The main goal of this paper is to relate the three strategies to the computational machinery connected to the monad C (strength and derived operations). As will be shown, both the polyadic approach and the continuation-based approach make heavy use of monad constructs. In the traditional movement strategy, monad constructs are not used but we still need them to explain how the three strategies are related and what can be expected of them wrt handling scopal ambiguities in simple sentences.
机译:在本文中,我们将讨论三种语义上不同的范围分配策略:传统的移动策略,多元方法和基于连续的方法。由于集合X上的广义量词是C(X)的元素,因此在所有三种方法中,QP上X的连续单子C的值都被解释为C计算。本文的主要目标是将这三种策略与连接到monad C的计算设备相关联(强度和派生运算)。如将显示的那样,多元方法和基于延续的方法都大量使用了monad结构。在传统的移动策略中,不使用monad构造,但我们仍然需要它们来解释这三种策略之间的关系,以及用简单的句子来处理scopal歧义时可以期望它们如何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号