...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology >A comparative evaluation of bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and type I collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and fibrin fibronectin sealing system (TISSEEL) in the treatment of intrabony defects: A clini
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and type I collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and fibrin fibronectin sealing system (TISSEEL) in the treatment of intrabony defects: A clini

机译:牛源异种移植物(Bio-Oss胶原蛋白)与I型胶原膜(Bio-Oss胶原蛋白)和纤维蛋白纤连蛋白封闭系统(TISSEEL)的比较评估:斜纹棉布

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objectives:The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and Type I collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and fibrin fibronectin sealing system (TISSEEL) in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects.Materials and Methods:Fourteen healthy patients in the age range of 20 to 60 years, showing bilateral or contralateral infrabony defects were selected. The defects were assigned randomly to Site A (bovine-derived xenograft [Bio-Oss Collagen] with bioresorbable Type I collagen membrane [Bio-Gide]) and Site B (fibrin fibronectin sealing system [TISSEEL] with bovine-derived xenograft [Bio-Oss Collagen]). The radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months postoperatively.Results:All fourteen patients returned for recall at regular intervals till the completion of the study. Both the experimental groups showed clinically and radiographically statistically significant reduction in probing pocket depth and gain in clinical attachment level.Conclusion:Both groups showed potential for enhancing the periodontal regeneration with no statistically significant between the two groups; however, on comparison the Bio-Oss Collagen and TISSEEL group were slightly better.
机译:背景与目的:本研究的目的是比较牛源异种移植物(Bio-Oss胶原蛋白)和I型胶原膜(Bio-Gide)与牛源异种移植物(Bio-Oss胶原蛋白)和纤维蛋白纤连蛋白封闭的功效材料和方法:选择14例年龄在20至60岁之间,表现出双侧或对侧骨缺损的健康患者。将缺陷随机分配到部位A(具有可生物吸收的I型胶原膜[Bio-Gide]的牛源性异种移植物[Bio-Oss胶原蛋白])和具有牛源性异种移植物[Bio-Ocean]的纤维蛋白纤连蛋白封闭系统[TISSEEL]。胶原蛋白])。在基线,术后6个月和9个月时记录放射学参数。结果:所有14例患者均定期回诊,直至完成研究。两个实验组在临床和影像学上均显示探查袋深度和临床附着水平均有统计学意义的降低。结论:两组均显示出增强牙周再生的潜力,两组之间无统计学意义;但是,相比之下,Bio-Oss胶原蛋白和TISSEEL组稍好一些。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号