...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hymenoptera Research >Geometric morphometric discrimination of the three African honeybee subspecies Apis mellifera intermissa, A. m. sahariensis and A. m. capensis (Hymenoptera, Apidae): Fore wing and hind wing landmark configurations
【24h】

Geometric morphometric discrimination of the three African honeybee subspecies Apis mellifera intermissa, A. m. sahariensis and A. m. capensis (Hymenoptera, Apidae): Fore wing and hind wing landmark configurations

机译:非洲蜜蜂三个亚种Apis mellifera intermissa,A. m。的几何形态计量学判别。 sahariensis和A. m。 capensis(膜翅目,Apidae):前翅和后翅的标志性配置

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study, a landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis was carried out on three honeybee subspecies: Apis m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis collected from Algeria, and, as a reference, A. m. capensis collected from South Africa. The aim of this study was to discriminate honeybee subspecies by patterns of shape variation of fore and hind wings. A total of 540 wings from 270 honeybee workers were analyzed. Our results revealed very high cross-validation classification rates (96.7% based on fore wing shape and 99.6% based on the combination of fore and hind wing forms respectively). Discrimination was better using shape and form (shape + centroid size) of the fore wings than of the hind wings. The wing form parameters were found to differ significantly in shape and centroid size among the three analyzed subspecies. Finally, it may be concluded that landmark-based geometric morphometrics could be a powerful tool to characterize the Algerian honey bees.
机译:在这项研究中,对三个蜜蜂亚种Apis m进行了基于地标的几何形态分析。间奏和A. m。 sahariensis收集自阿尔及利亚,并作为参考。南非采集的卡普斯山。这项研究的目的是通过前翅和后翅的形状变化模式来区分蜜蜂亚种。分析了来自270位蜜蜂工人的540个翅膀。我们的结果显示出很高的交叉验证分类率(分别基于前翼形状的96.7%和前翼和后翼形式的组合的99.6%)。使用前翅的形状和形式(形状+质心大小)比后翅的区分更好。在三个被分析的亚种之间,发现机翼形状参数在形状和质心大小上存在显着差异。最后,可以得出结论,基于地标的几何形态计量学可能是表征阿尔及利亚蜜蜂的有力工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号