首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Information Policy >Incorporating the Study of Knowledge into the IPE Mainstream, or, When Does a Trade Agreement Stop Being a Trade Agreement? on JSTOR
【24h】

Incorporating the Study of Knowledge into the IPE Mainstream, or, When Does a Trade Agreement Stop Being a Trade Agreement? on JSTOR

机译:将知识研究纳入IPE主流,或者什么时候贸易协定不再是贸易协定?在JSTOR上

获取原文
       

摘要

The treatment of knowledgea??most notably commodified knowledgea??as a source and vector of power potentially is a key blind spot in our understanding of the global political economy. This article offers a theoretical framework, based on the work of Susan Strange, for considering the relationship between what she called the a??knowledge structurea?? and the other key sources of political and economic powera??security, production, and finance. This framework is applied to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, demonstrating how a direct focus on knowledge governance reveals power relations and economic effects that are otherwise obscured.
机译:将知识-最值得注意的是商品化知识-视为权力的来源和载体,这可能是我们对全球政治经济学认识的关键盲点。本文基于Susan Strange的工作,提供了一个理论框架,用于考虑她所谓的“知识结构”之间的关系。政治和经济实力的其他主要来源,即安全,生产和金融。该框架适用于跨太平洋伙伴关系,展示了如何直接关注知识治理如何揭示权力关系和经济影响,而这种关系本来就难以为继。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号