...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education >Ecosystem Services and Reallocation Choices: A Framework for Preserving Semi‐Arid Regions in the Southwest
【24h】

Ecosystem Services and Reallocation Choices: A Framework for Preserving Semi‐Arid Regions in the Southwest

机译:生态系统服务与再分配选择:西南半干旱地区保护框架

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Conservation of fresh water systems is a paramount issue in the semi-arid Southwestern U.S. (Department of Interior 2005). In these systems, ground water, surface water and flood regimes strongly influence the abundance, composition, and structure of riparian (streamside) vegetation, diversity and abundance of avian populations, and thus overall quantity and quality of system attributes and ecosystem services. Over time, these systems (Zekster et al. 2005) have been degraded by anthropogenic activities and, more recently, are threatened by climate change (Stromberg et al. 2007, Serrat-Capdevila et al. 2007, Alley et al. 2002).For water reallocation efforts to succeed in preserving these systems, a stakeholder community and/or policy maker requires a clear understanding of the management options available and a means to evaluate these options. Management options can be controversial, especially when the reallocation of existing water rights is required. One potentially effective approach is a Decision Support System, a class of interactive computerized information systems that support decision-making activities (Power 2002). For water management where ecosystem services are part of the decision-making criteria, a decision support system should have the capability of evaluating management options through the use of a series of coupled physical and ecological models that generate ecosystem service outputs. These outputs can then be reflected as monetized societal values for purposes of analyzing management options. However, ecosystem service values generally remain unknown relative to market values for goods and services.A primary focus of this paper is the value of ecosystem services and how they are derived from a broad base of scientific information. A central tenet of our efforts is that ecosystem values are appropriately driven by sound scientific information and thus values and sound science are inextricably linked. Valuation studies are typically conducted in the absence of integrated science information either because (1) targeted scientific research on the topic of interest is lacking, or (2) scientific studies that do exist have not been adequately designed to directly inform the valuation questions. We summarize previous scientific studies and present an approach in which ecosystem values are appropriately driven by these studies, and can feed back into a decision support system as a potential framework to help decision makers. We also focus on the process of transferring these values to other semi-arid areas, a key gap in our ability to use science and ecological valuation to help guide management in the region. Finally, in the conclusion, we touch upon the issue of integration of these values back into a decision support system for purposes of evaluating management options.Our starting point is an existing web-based decision support system that was developed with the Upper San Pedro Partnership (Yalcin and Lansey 2004).1 Our approach is summarized in Figure 1. The initial step, as detailed in Box 1, is to characterize the ecosystem. This requires an understanding of the components, processes within the system and its outputs. It is the outputs that are of central interest for valuation of ecosystems services. The next step (Box 2) is to develop scenarios. While restoration is a first and central goal in many systems, this represents only the beginning, not the end. Preservation of these systems in the face of dynamic climatic and anthropogenic effects is an important public policy issue. In the case of the San Pedro effort, we focus on ground water changes resulting from various anthropogenic changes. The third step (Box 3) is the coupled model of the physical and biological systems whose relationships are represented, often in simplified form, within the Decision Support System. This represents what might be termed “current conditions” of the overall system representing the understanding of the systems components an
机译:在半干旱的美国西南部,淡水系统的保护是至关重要的问题(内政部,2005年)。在这些系统中,地下水,地表水和洪水状况会强烈影响河岸(河流)植被的丰度,组成和结构,鸟类种群的多样性和丰度,进而影响系统属性和生态系统服务的总体数量和质量。随着时间的流逝,这些系统(Zekster等人,2005年)已因人为活动而退化,并且最近受到气候变化的威胁(Stromberg等人,2007年; Serrat-Capdevila等人,2007年; Alley等人,2002年)。为了使水分配成功地保护这些系统,利益相关者社区和/或决策者需要对可用的管理选项有清晰的了解,并需要一种评估这些选项的方法。管理方案可能会引起争议,尤其是当需要重新分配现有水权时。一种可能有效的方法是决策支持系统,这是一类支持决策活动的交互式计算机信息系统(Power 2002)。对于将生态系统服务作为决策标准一部分的水管理而言,决策支持系统应具有通过使用一系列产生生态系统服务输出的物理和生态耦合模型来评估管理方案的能力。然后,可以将这些输出反映为货币化的社会价值,以分析管理选项。但是,相对于商品和服务的市场价值,生态系统服务的价值通常仍然是未知的。本文的主要重点是生态系统服务的价值以及它们如何从广泛的科学信息基础中得出。我们努力的中心原则是,生态系统的价值由合理的科学信息适当地驱动,因此价值与合理的科学有着密不可分的联系。估值研究通常是在缺乏综合科学信息的情况下进行的,原因是(1)缺少针对感兴趣主题的针对性科学研究,或者(2)没有充分设计出直接针对估值问题的科学研究。我们总结了以前的科学研究,并提出了一种方法,在这些方法中,这些研究适当地驱动了生态系统的价值,并可以反馈到决策支持系统中,作为帮助决策者的潜在框架。我们还将重点放在将这些价值转移到其他半干旱地区的过程中,这是我们利用科学和生态价值评估来帮助指导该地区管理的能力方面的主要差距。最后,在总结中,我们谈到了将这些价值重新整合到决策支持系统中以评估管理选项的问题。我们的出发点是与上圣佩德罗合伙企业合作开发的现有基于网络的决策支持系统(Yalcin和Lansey,2004年)。1图1总结了我们的方法。如方框1所示,第一步是表征生态系统。这需要了解系统中的组件,过程及其输出。对于生态系统服务的估值而言,正是这些产出至关重要。下一步(方框2)是开发方案。尽管恢复是许多系统的首要目标,但这只是开始,而不是结束。面对动态的气候和人为影响,保护这些系统是重要的公共政策问题。在San Pedro的努力中,我们重点研究各种人为变化导致的地下水变化。第三步(方框3)是物理和生物系统的耦合模型,其关系通常以简化的形式表示在决策支持系统中。这代表了整个系统的“当前状况”,代表了对系统组件的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号