首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection and public health. >Comparison of the tuberculin skin test and Quanti-FERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-G) test for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in dialysis patients
【24h】

Comparison of the tuberculin skin test and Quanti-FERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-G) test for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in dialysis patients

机译:结核菌素皮肤试验和Quanti-FERON-TB黄金管试验(QFT-G)试验在透析患者中​​潜伏性结核感染诊断中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Dialysis patients are more likely than the general population to develop active tuberculosis (TB). In these patients, the availability of a highly sensitive and specific test to diagnose latent TB will ensure earlier treatment and decreased progression to active disease. In the current study, the Quanti-FERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-G) test was compared with the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among 200 hemodialysis patients and 15 confirmed TB disease cases in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. Among the LTBI cases, 26 (13%) were TST positive, and 65 (32.5%) were positive by the QTF-G test, with an overall agreement between the 2 tests of 75.5% (k=0.34) being observed. Among the confirmed tuberculosis disease cases, none were positive by TST, and 10 (66.7%) were positive by the QTF-G test, resulting in an overall agreement of 33.3% (k=0). A comparison between the TST and the QTF-G test was performed based on the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) obtained for the tests. The QTF-G test was more sensitive and less specific than the TST in predicting the confirmed TB disease cases. When we tested the correspondence of the AUC values between the 2 diagnostic modalities, the obtained p-value was 0.0003. In conclusion, the AUCs of the examined diagnostic modalities are significantly different in predicting LTBI and tuberculosis.
机译:透析患者比普通人群更容易患上活动性结核病(TB)。在这些患者中,可以使用高度敏感和特异性的测试来诊断潜伏性结核病,这将确保更早治疗并降低活动性疾病的进展。在本研究中,将Quanti-FERON-TB黄金管(QFT-G)测试与结核菌素皮肤测试(TST)进行了比较,以诊断200例血液透析患者和15例确诊的结核病中的潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)沙特阿拉伯三级护理中心的病例。在LTBI病例中,通过QTF-G测试,TST阳性26例(13%),TST阳性65例(32.5%),两项测试之间的总体一致性为75.5%(k = 0.34)。在确诊的结核病病例中,TST阳性无一例,而QTF-G测试阳性10例(66.7%),阳性率为33.3%(k = 0)。基于灵敏度,特异性和为测试获得的曲线下面积(AUC),对TST和QTF-G测试进行了比较。与TST相比,QTF-G测试在预测已确诊的结核病病例方面更敏感,特异性更低。当我们测试两种诊断方式之间的AUC值的对应关系时,获得的p值为0.0003。总之,所检查的诊断方式的AUC在预测LTBI和结核病方面显着不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号