首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology >Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Measuring the Position of Miniscrew Implants using Two-dimensional Orthopantomogram and a Three-dimensional Imaging with Direct Method on Dried Skull
【24h】

Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Measuring the Position of Miniscrew Implants using Two-dimensional Orthopantomogram and a Three-dimensional Imaging with Direct Method on Dried Skull

机译:二维正射影图和直接法在干颅骨上进行三维成像的微型螺钉植入物位置测量精度的评估和比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction The accuracy of position of miniscrew implants is utmost important for implant success. In this study, we investigated whether the routine 2D ortopantomogram can be used to assess the accuracy in the placement of miniscrews as compared with 3D radiography and direct measurements on a dried skull. Methods: Miniscrew implants were placed in between premolar and molar areas at an angulation of 40? to 50? for maxilla and 10? to 20? for mandible on dried skull. Linear and angular measurements were taken on these dried skulls using direct method, ortopantomogram and 3D radiography. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison Tukey's test were used to test for differences in three methods. Results: The results shows 20% vertical magnification for maxilla and mandible whereas horizontal measurements shows 54.2% of variations in maxilla and 27.1% of variations in mandible on panoramic radiographs as compared to direct method and 3D radiography. Angular measurements show 9? to 10? of variation on panoramic radiographs as compared to direct method and 3D radiography for both maxilla and mandible. Conclusion: Ortopantomogram shows more variations on linear and angular measurements as compared to direct method and 3D radiography whereas direct method and 3D radiography show no difference. But, we can calculate the angulations of miniscrew implant placement by angular regression model.
机译:简介微螺钉植入物的位置精度对于成功植入至关重要。在这项研究中,我们调查了与3D射线照相和直接在干燥的颅骨上进行测量相比,常规2D或拓扑图是否可用于评估微型螺钉放置的准确性。方法:将微螺钉植入物以40?角放置在前磨牙区和磨牙区之间。到50?上颌骨和10个?到20?下颌骨干的下颌骨。使用直接方法,正像图和3D射线照相法对这些干燥的头骨进行线性和角度测量。方差分析(ANOVA)和多重比较Tukey检验用于测试三种方法的差异。结果:与直接方法和3D射线照相相比,结果显示全景放射线照片上颌骨和下颌骨的垂直放大率为20%,而水平测量结果显示上颌骨的54.2%和下颌骨的27.1%。角度测量显示9?到十?上颌骨和下颌骨与直接方法和3D射线照相相比,全景射线照相的变化。结论:与直接法和3D射线照相相比,正像图在线性和角度测量中显示出更多的变化,而直接法和3D射线照相则没有差异。但是,我们可以通过角度回归模型来计算微型螺钉植入物的放置角度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号