首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology >A comparative evaluation of diode laser ablation versus scalpel excision for management of oral leukoplakia
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of diode laser ablation versus scalpel excision for management of oral leukoplakia

机译:二极管激光消融与手术刀切除治疗口腔白斑的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim: Oral leukoplakia, a potentially malignant disorder with malignant transformation rate ranging from 0.6% to 20%, requires immediate attention. Therefore, for moderate to severe dysplasia, complete surgical removal is the treatment modality. This study aimed to evaluate two treatment modalities of oral leukoplakia using diode laser and scalpel surgery and to compare the outcome of both interventions regarding postoperative pain and functional disturbances. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients with oral leukoplakia were recruited and block randomization was done splitting into diode and scalpel groups. Patients were evaluated for pain and functional disturbances postoperatively using visual analog score (VAS) and Gorsky criteria, respectively, in the first 3 days and 1supst/sup, 2supnd/sup, and 4supth/sup weeks and periodically followed up for 4 years for recurrences. Results: The mean age was 38 years. The results showed a significant difference in diode group compared with scalpel group for postoperative pain assessed in VAS scale using paired “t-test” and functional disturbance using Chi-square test. None showed recurrence in the subsequent 4 years of follow-up among diode, whereas scalpel group showed recurrence in two patients. Conclusion: Complete resolution of the lesion with minimum patient discomfort was observed in patients treated with diode compared with scalpel, suggesting diode laser is an effective method over the conventional method.
机译:背景与目的:口腔白斑是一种潜在的恶性疾病,其恶性转化率为0.6%至20%,需要立即引起注意。因此,对于中度至重度不典型增生,完全手术切除是治疗方式。这项研究旨在评估使用二极管激光和手术刀手术治疗口腔白斑的两种治疗方式,并比较两种术后疼痛和功能障碍的干预措施的效果。材料与方法:总共招募了30例口腔白斑患者,并按区组随机分为二极管组和手术刀组。分别在头3天和1 ,2 nd 和4分别使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Gorsky标准评估术后患者的疼痛和功能障碍 th 周,并定期随访4年以防复发。结果:平均年龄为38岁。结果显示,使用成对“ t检验”和卡方检验,以VAS量表评估的术后疼痛,二极管组与手术刀组相比有显着差异。在随后的4年中,二极管无一例复发,而手术刀组有两例复发。结论:与手术刀相比,使用二极管治疗的患者可观察到病灶完全消退且患者不适感最小,这表明二极管激光是一种优于传统方法的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号