...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of healthcare engineering. >Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects
【24h】

Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects

机译:对欧洲标准FFP呼吸器和口罩的防护以防止颗粒物的粒度选择评估-经人类受试者测试

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study was conducted to investigate the protection of disposable filtering half-facepiece respirators of different grades against particles between 0.093 and 1.61 μm. A personal sampling system was used to particle size-selectively assess the protection of respirators. The results show that about 10.9% of FFP2 respirators and 28.2% of FFP3 respirators demonstrate assigned protection factors (APFs) below 10 and 20, which are the levels assigned for these respirators by the British Standard. On average, the protection factors of FFP respirators were 11.5 to 15.9 times greater than those of surgical masks. The minimum protection factors (PFs) were observed for particles between 0.263 and 0.384 μm. No significant difference in PF results was found among FFP respirator categories and particle size. A strong association between fit factors and protection factors was found. The study indicates that FFP respirators may not achieve the expected protection level and the APFs may need to be revised for these classes of respirators.
机译:本研究旨在研究不同等级的一次性过滤式半面罩呼吸器对0.093至1.61μm之间的颗粒的防护。使用个人采样系统对颗粒大小进行选择性评估,以保护呼吸器。结果显示,约有10.9%的FFP2呼吸器和28.2%的FFP3呼吸器显示出低于10和20的分配保护因子(APF),这是英国标准为这些呼吸器分配的水平。平均而言,FFP呼吸器的防护系数是口罩的11.5至15.9倍。观察到的最小保护因子(PFs)介于0.263和0.384μm之间。在FFP呼吸器类别和粒径之间,PF结果无显着差异。发现适合因子和保护因子之间有很强的关联。研究表明,FFP呼吸器可能无法达到预期的防护水平,并且可能需要针对这些类型的呼吸器修改APF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号