首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geography and Geology >Intergration of GIS Using GEOSTAtistical INterpolation Techniques (Kriging) (GEOSTAINT-K) in Deterministic Models for Landslide Susceptibility Analysis (LSA) at Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
【24h】

Intergration of GIS Using GEOSTAtistical INterpolation Techniques (Kriging) (GEOSTAINT-K) in Deterministic Models for Landslide Susceptibility Analysis (LSA) at Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

机译:在马来西亚沙巴州亚庇的滑坡敏感性分析(LSA)确定性模型中,使用地理统计插值技术(Kriging)(GEOSTAINT-K)集成了GIS

获取原文
       

摘要

A practical application for landslide susceptibility analysis (LSA) based on GEOSTAtistical INterpolation Techniques (Kriging) (GEOSTAINT-K) for a deterministic model was used to calculate the factor of safety (FOS) and failure probabilities for the area of Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. In this paper, the LSA value can be expressed by a FOS value, which is the ratio of forces that make the slope fail and those that prevent the slope from failing. A geotechnical engineering properties data base has been developed on the basis of a series of parameter maps such as effective cohesion (C’), unit weight of soil (g), depth of failure surface (Z), height of ground water table (Zw), Zw/Z dimensionless (m), unit weight of water (gw), slope surface inclination (?) and effective angle of shearing resistance (f). Taking into consideration the cause of the landslide, identified as groundwater change, two scenarios of landslide activity were studied. Scenario 1 considered the minimum groundwater level recorded corresponding to the actual situation of the most recent landslide while Scenario 2 considered the reverse. A simple method (infinite slope model) for error propagation was used to calculate the variance of the FOS and the probability that will be less than 1 for each pixel. The highest probability value of the various scenarios was selected for each pixel and final LSA 1 (scenario 1) and LSA 2 (scenario 2) maps were constructed. The validation between the examined LSA 1 and LSA 2 maps and the results of the landslide distribution map (LDM) were evaluated. This deterministic model had higher prediction accuracy. The prediction accuracy was 81 % and 85 %, respectively. In general for both factors, the LSA 2 map showed higher accuracy compared to the LSA 1 map. The resulting LSA map can be used by local administrators or developers to locate areas prone to landslides, determine the land use suitability and organize more detailed analysis of the “hot spot” areas identified.
机译:在确定性模型的基础上,基于GEOSTAtistical插值技术(Kriging)(GEOSTAINT-K)在滑坡敏感性分析(LSA)的实际应用中,计算了沙巴州亚庇地区的安全系数(FOS)和破坏概率。在本文中,LSA值可以用FOS值表示,FOS值是使斜坡失效的力与防止斜坡失效的力之比。在一系列参数图的基础上开发了岩土工程属性数据库,例如有效内聚力(C'),土壤单位重量(g),破坏面深度(Z),地下水位高度(Zw) ),Zw / Z无因次(m),水的单位重量(gw),斜面倾斜度(η)和抗剪切有效角(f)。考虑到滑坡的成因,即地下水变化,研究了两种滑坡活动情景。方案1考虑了与最近的滑坡的实际情况相对应的最低地下水位,而方案2考虑了相反的情况。一种用于误差传播的简单方法(无限斜率模型)用于计算FOS的方差以及每个像素小于1的概率。为每个像素选择各种方案的最高概率值,并构建最终的LSA 1(方案1)和LSA 2(方案2)图。评估了检查的LSA 1和LSA 2图之间的有效性以及滑坡分布图(LDM)的结果。该确定性模型具有较高的预测精度。预测准确度分别为81%和85%。通常,对于这两个因素,与LSA 1图相比,LSA 2图都显示出更高的准确性。生成的LSA地图可由本地管理员或开发人员用来查找容易发生滑坡的区域,确定土地使用的适宜性,并对确定的“热点”区域进行更详细的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号