...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences >Under the lens: Dental expert witnesses in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom
【24h】

Under the lens: Dental expert witnesses in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom

机译:镜头下:巴西,克罗地亚,印度尼西亚,意大利,沙特阿拉伯和英国的牙科专家证人

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The dentists’ main job is to restore health and function to the oral cavity. However, dental professionals can also be involved in medico legal activities as forensic odontologists or by being Expert Witnesses (EW) to testify in professional liability cases, car accidents and work-related injuries. When called to act as an expert witness by the Court, the appointed dentist has to combine both biological and technical knowledge with equivalent medico-legal and forensic knowledge. Spontaneous involvement in medico-legal matters without an adequate training and experience can lead to mistakes with irreversible consequences. As an expert witness, the dentist has precise responsibility with civil and/or penal consequences, depending on the national judicial system. Dental Expert Witness, working either privately or appointed by the Court, has defined responsibilities and is subjected to civil or criminal proceedings (depending on the judicial system) if found wanting. Keeping in mind that there are significant differences regarding the requirements of becoming eligible to be a Dental Expert Witness in different legal systems. In this work the authors investigated the Judicial Systems regarding the appointment of Dental Expert Witnesses in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom ( Table 1 ), in order to marshal knowledge towards harmonization and the attainment of best practice. This premise acknowledges the fact that forensic odontology must encompass the necessity for robust systems of audit and accreditation for it to be accepted as an “evidence based” forensic discipline. Further steps to ensure quality assurance in legal dentistry and forensic odontology training should be considered to prevent the spontaneous involvement of inappropriately trained dentists to become involved in making decisions that are beyond their competence and expertise. Table 1 Summary of the difference between systems in expert witness requirements in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom Open in a separate window.
机译:牙医的主要工作是恢复口腔的健康和功能。但是,牙科专业人员也可以作为法医牙医,也可以作为专家证人(EW)参加医学法律活动,以证明专业责任案件,交通事故和与工作有关的伤害。当被法院任命为专家证人时,指定的牙医必须将生物学和技术知识与同等的法律医学和法医学知识相结合。未经足够的培训和经验就自发地参与法医学事务可能会导致错误,并产生不可逆转的后果。作为专家证人,牙医应根据国家司法制度对民事和/或刑事后果承担确切责任。牙科专家证人,无论是私人工作还是由法院任命,都有明确的职责,如果发现需要,可以接受民事或刑事诉讼(取决于司法制度)。请记住,在不同的法律体系中,有资格成为牙科专家证人的要求存在很大差异。在这项工作中,作者调查了有关在巴西,克罗地亚,印度尼西亚,意大利,沙特阿拉伯和英国(表1)任命牙科专家证人的司法制度,以统筹协调和实现最佳实践的知识。该前提认识到以下事实:法医牙科学必须包含建立健全的审核和鉴定系统的必要性,以使其被接受为“基于证据的”法医学科。应该考虑采取进一步措施来确保法律牙科和法医牙齿学培训的质量保证,以防止未经适当培训的牙医自发地参与做出超出其能力和专业知识的决策。表1巴西,克罗地亚,印度尼西亚,意大利,沙特阿拉伯和英国的专家证人要求制度之间的差异摘要在单独的窗口中打开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号