...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forest Science >How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?
【24h】

How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?

机译:接近自然的松树造林活动与自然有多近?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Structural parameters of Scots pine stands (129–191 years) on their natural sites (270–600 m a.s.l.) are described on 6 permanent research plots (PRP; 3 in managed stands using near-natural silvicultural practices and 3 in stands without active forest management for 3 decades at least) in areas of western, central and eastern Bohemia and in the Polish part of the Krkono?e Mts. In the framework of the study structural and growth parameters, horizontal and vertical structure and biodiversity were evaluated on the plots. A comparison of the plots, and of managed and unmanaged plots showed a relatively high variability in different parameters. Nevertheless, the results document that managed stands, compared to forest stands without management, mostly have significantly higher standing volumes (1.5 times in total and 1.7 times in pine), which is caused by more extreme sites. An opposite trend was found out in dead wood volume, which is distinctly higher in unmanaged stands. Differences in the other parameters are not so pronounced, probably because small-scale management is used and because a relatively short time since the stands were left to spontaneous development has elapsed (30–52 years).
机译:在6个永久性研究区(PRP;在使用近乎自然造林实践的管理林中有3个,在没有活跃森林的林中有3个)上描述了其自然地点(270-600 m asl)上的苏格兰松林林分(129-191年)的结构参数至少在波西米亚西部,中部和东部地区以及Krkono?e山的波兰部分进行了至少3年的管理。在研究结构和生长参数的框架内,在样地上评估了水平和垂直结构以及生物多样性。地块的比较以及托管和非托管地块的比较显示出不同参数的相对较高的可变性。尽管如此,与没有管理的林分相比,管理林分的结果文件大多具有显着更高的林分体积(总量为松树的1.5倍,松树为1.7倍),这是由更多的极端地点引起的。在死木量方面发现了相反的趋势,在未管理的林分中明显更高。其他参数之间的差异并不那么明显,这可能是因为使用了小型管理,并且自从看台自发发展以来已经过了很短的时间(30-52年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号