首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geodetic Science >Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes' formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area
【24h】

Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes' formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area

机译:Stokes公式技术的准计算类星体在Auvergne测试区域上的删除,计算,恢复和最小二乘修改的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique for regional geoid determination implies that both topography and low-degree global geopotential model signals are removed before computation and restored after Stokes' integration or Least Squares Collocation (LSC) solution. The Least Squares Modification of Stokes' Formula (LSMS) technique not requiring gravity reductions is implemented here with a Residual Terrain Modelling based interpolation of gravity data. The 2-D Spherical Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the LSC methods applying the RCR technique and the LSMS method are tested over the Auvergne test area. All methods showed a reasonable agreement with GPS-levelling data, in the order of a 3-3.5 cm in the central region having relatively smooth topography, which is consistent with the accuracies of GPS and levelling. When a 1-parameter fit is used, the FFT method using kernel modification performs best with 3.0 cm r.m.s difference with GPS-levelling while the LSMS method gives the best agreement with GPS-levelling with 2.4 cm r.m.s after a 4-parameter fit is used. However, the quasi-geoid models derived using two techniques differed from each other up to 33 cm in the high mountains near the Alps. Comparison of quasi-geoid models with EGM2008 showed that the LSMS method agreed best in term of r.m.s.
机译:用于区域大地水准面确定的去除-计算-恢复(RCR)技术意味着地形和低度全局地势模型信号都在计算之前被去除,并在Stokes积分或最小二乘配置(LSC)解决方案后被恢复。斯托克斯公式(LSMS)的最小二乘修改不需要重力降低,在此通过基于残差地形模型的重力数据插值实现。在Auvergne测试区域上测试了应用RCR技术和LSMS方法的二维球形快速傅立叶变换(FFT)和LSC方法。所有方法均显示出与GPS水准仪数据的合理一致性,在中心区域的3-3.5 cm处具有相对平滑的地形,这与GPS和水准仪的精度是一致的。当使用1参数拟合时,使用内核修改的FFT方法在GPS调平的情况下以3.0 cm rms的差异表现最佳,而LSMS方法在使用4参数拟合的情况下与2.4 cm rms的GPS水准具有最佳的一致性。 。但是,在阿尔卑斯山附近的高山中,使用两种技术得出的准地壳模型在33 cm处彼此不同。准类群模型与EGM2008的比较表明,LSMS方法在r.m.s方面最为吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号