首页> 外文期刊>Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra >Evaluation of Anosognosia in Alzheimer's Disease Using the Symptoms of Early Dementia-11 Questionnaire (SED-11Q)
【24h】

Evaluation of Anosognosia in Alzheimer's Disease Using the Symptoms of Early Dementia-11 Questionnaire (SED-11Q)

机译:使用早期痴呆症11调查问卷(SED-11Q)症状评估阿尔茨海默病的厌食症

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims: The objective is to propose a brief method to evaluate anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using the Symptoms of Early Dementia-11 Questionnaire (SED-11Q), a short informant-based screening questionnaire for identifying dementia. Methods: The participants were 107 elderly individuals: 13 with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5, 73 with mild AD of CDR 1, and 21 with moderate AD of CDR 2. The patients and caregivers answered the SED-11Q independently, and the degree of discrepancy indicated the severity of anosognosia. Results: The scores were as follows: caregiver scores were 2.46 ± 1.85 (mean ± SD) in CDR 0.5, 6.36 ± 3.02 in CDR 1, and 9.00 ± 1.14 in CDR 2; patient scores were 2.00 ± 1.78, 2.55 ± 2.33, and 1.33 ± 2.46, respectively. Discrepancy was 0.46 ± 1.61, 3.81 ± 3.95, and 7.67 ± 2.87, respectively, and the caregiver assessments were significantly higher than the patient assessments in CDR 1 and CDR 2 (p < 0.001 in both groups). The SED-11Q for anosognosia was validated with the standardized Anosognosia Questionnaire for Dementia (AD-Q). The caregiver scores were moderately correlated with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia scores (r = 0.524), and the patient scores were moderately correlated with depression scores (r = 0.561). Conclusion: The SED-11Q serves a dual purpose: caregiver assessment is useful for the screening of dementia, and any discrepancy between the patient and the caregiver assessment is considered as an indication of the severity of anosognosia; this can be informative for caregivers and essential for successful care.
机译:目的:目的是提出一种简短的方法,以早期痴呆症症状调查问卷(SED-11Q)的症状来评估阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)的厌食症,这是一种基于线人的简短筛查问卷,用于识别痴呆症。方法:参与者为107名老年患者:13例临床痴呆评分(CDR)为0.5,73例轻度AD为CDR 1,21例中度AD为CDR2。患者和护理人员独立回答SED-11Q,差异程度表明了误诊的严重性。结果:得分如下:护理员得分在CDR 0.5中为2.46±1.85(平均值±SD),在CDR 1中为6.36±3.02,在CDR 2中为9.00±1.14;患者得分分别为2.00±1.78、2.55±2.33和1.33±2.46。差异分别为0.46±1.61、3.81±3.95和7.67±2.87,并且护理人员评估显着高于CDR 1和CDR 2的患者评估(两组均p <0.001)。 SED-11Q的失语症已通过痴呆症的标准失语症问卷(AD-Q)进行了验证。照顾者评分与痴呆症的行为和心理症状呈中度相关(r = 0.524),患者评分与抑郁症评分呈中度相关(r = 0.561)。结论:SED-11Q具有双重目的:看护人评估可用于痴呆症筛查,患者与看护人评估之间的任何差异均被视为提示失语症的严重程度;这可以为护理人员提供信息,对成功护理至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号