...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of earth system science >Site response of the Ganges Basin inferred from re-evaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra and 1934 Nepal earthquakes
【24h】

Site response of the Ganges Basin inferred from re-evaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra and 1934 Nepal earthquakes

机译:根据对1897年西隆,1905年坎格拉和1934年尼泊尔地震的重新评估的宏观地震观测结果推断,恒河盆地的场地响应

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We analyze previously published geodetic data and intensity values for the e?‘€e?‘? = 8.1 Shillong (1897), e?‘€e?‘? = 7.8 Kangra (1905), and e?‘€e?‘? = 8.2 Nepal/Bihar (1934) earthquakes to investigate the rupture zones of these earthquakes as well as the amplification of ground motions throughout the Punjab, Ganges and Brahmaputra valleys. For each earthquake we subtract the observed MSK intensities from a synthetic intensity derived from an inferred planar rupture model of the earthquake, combined with an attenuation function derived from instrumentally recorded earthquakes. The resulting residuals are contoured to identify regions of anomalous intensity caused primarily by local site effects. Observations indicative of liquefaction are treated separately from other indications of shaking severity lest they inflate inferred residual shaking estimates. Despite this precaution we find that intensites are 1a€“3 units higher near the major rivers, as well as at the edges of the Ganges basin. We find evidence for a post-critical Moho reflection from the 1897 and 1905 earthquakes that raises intensities 1a€“2 units at distances of the order of 150 km from the rupture zone, and we find that the 1905 earthquake triggered a substantial subsequent earthquake at Dehra Dun, at a distance of approximately 150 km. Four or more e?‘€ = 8 earthquakes are apparently overdue in the region based on seismic moment summation in the past 500 years. Results from the current study permit anticipated intensities in these future earthquakes to be refined to incorporate site effects derived from dense macroseismic data.
机译:我们分析先前发布的e?'e?'?的大地测量数据和强度值。 = 8.1西隆(1897),e?‘€e?’? = 7.8 Kangra(1905),然后是e?‘€e?’? = 8.2尼泊尔/比哈尔邦(1934年)地震,以调查这些地震的破裂带以及整个旁遮普邦,恒河和雅鲁藏布江山谷的地震动。对于每个地震,我们从推论的平面地震破裂模型得出的综合强度中减去观测到的MSK强度,再加上从仪器记录的地震中得出的衰减函数。轮廓化所得的残差以识别主要由局部位点效应引起的异常强度区域。指示液化的观测值与其他震动严重度指标分开处理,以免它们推升推断的残留震动估计值。尽管采取了这种预防措施,我们发现在主要河流附近以及恒河盆地边缘的强度要高出1至3个单位。我们发现证据表明1897年和1905年地震发生了震后的Moho反射,该地震在距破裂带约150 km的距离内增强了强度1a-2”,并且我们发现1905年地震引发了随后的实质性地震。德拉敦(Dehra Dun),距离约150公里。根据过去500年的地震矩求和,该地区显然有4场或以上8次地震。当前研究的结果允许对这些未来地震的预期烈度进行改进,以纳入从密集的宏观地震数据中得出的场地效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号