...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care >Critique of ‘Percutaneous Tracheostomy: To Bronch or not to Bronch—That is the Question’
【24h】

Critique of ‘Percutaneous Tracheostomy: To Bronch or not to Bronch—That is the Question’

机译:对“经皮气管切开术:要打断还是不打结,这是个问题”的批评

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a routine procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). Some surgeons perform percutaneous tracheostomies using bronchoscopy believing that it increases safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate percutaneous tracheostomy in the trauma population and to determine whether the use of a bronchoscope decreases the complication rate and improves safety. Methods: A retrospective review was completed from January 2007 to November 2010. Inclusion criteria were trauma patients undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy. Data collected included age, Abbreviated Injury Score by region, Injury Severity Score, ventilator days, and outcomes. Complications were classified as early (occurring within 24 h after the procedure). Results: During the study period, 9,663 trauma patients were admitted, with 1,587 undergoing intubation and admission to the ICU. Tracheostomies were performed in 266 patients and 243 of these were percutaneous; 78 (32%) were performed with the bronchoscope (Bronch) and 168 (68%) without bronchoscope (No Bronch). There were no differences between the groups in Abbreviated Injury Score by region, Injury Severity Score, probability of survival, ventilator days, and length of ICU or overall hospital stay. There were 16 complications, 5 (Bronch) and 11 (No Bronch). Early complications were primarily bleeding (Bronch 3% vs. No Bronch 4%, not statistically significant). Late complications included tracheomalacia, tracheal granulation tissue, bleeding, and stenosis; Bronch 4% versus No Bronch 3%, (not statistically significant). One major complication occurred, with loss of airway and cardiac arrest, in the bronchoscopy group. Conclusion: Percutaneous tracheostomy was safely and effectively performed by an experienced surgical team both with and without bronchoscopic guidance with no difference in the complication rates. This study suggests that the use of bronchoscopic guidance during tracheostomy is not routinely required but may be used as an important adjunct in selected patients, such as those with HALO cervical fixation, obesity, or difficult anatomy.
机译:背景:经皮气管切开术是重症监护病房(ICU)的常规程序。一些外科医生使用支气管镜进行经皮气管切开术,认为这样做可以提高安全性。这项研究的目的是评估创伤人群中的经皮气管切开术,并确定使用支气管镜是否会降低并发症发生率并提高安全性。方法:回顾性研究于2007年1月至2010年11月完成。纳入标准为接受经皮气管切开术的创伤患者。收集的数据包括年龄,按地区划分的简短伤害评分,伤害严重度评分,呼吸机天数和结果。并发症归类为早期(发生在手术后24小时内)。结果:在研究期间,共收治了9,663例创伤患者,其中1,587例接受了插管和入ICU。 266例患者做了气管切开术,其中243例是经皮的。使用支气管镜(Bronch)进行78例(32%),不使用支气管镜(No Bronch)进行168例(68%)。两组之间在按区域划分的总伤害评分,伤害严重度评分,生存率,呼吸机天数以及ICU时间或整体住院时间方面没有差异。有16例并发症,其中5例(分支)和11例(无分支)。早期并发症主要是出血(Bronch 3%vs. No Bronch 4%,无统计学意义)。晚期并发症包括气管软弱,气管肉芽组织,出血和狭窄。断头4%与否断头3%(无统计学意义)。支气管镜检查组发生了一项主要并发症,气道丢失和心脏骤停。结论:由经验丰富的手术团队在有或没有支气管镜引导下安全,有效地进行经皮气管切开术,并发症发生率无差异。这项研究表明,在气管切开术期间不需要常规使用支气管镜引导,但可以将其用作某些患者的重要辅助手段,例如具有HALO颈椎固定,肥胖症或解剖困难的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号