...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Oral Science >Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
【24h】

Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis

机译:具有不同类型的种植体-基台关节的三元件假体的机械和塑料顶盖:应变仪比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Using strain gauge (SG) analysis, the aim of this in vitro study was quantify the strain development during the fixation of three-unit screw implant-supported fixed partial dentures, varying the types of implant-abutment joints and the type of prosthetic coping. The hypotheses were that the type of hexagonal connection would generate different microstrains and the type of copings would produce similar microstrains after prosthetic screws had been tightened onto microunit abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dental implants with external (EH) and internal (IH) hexagonal configurations were inserted into two polyurethane blocks. Microunit abutments were screwed onto their respective implant groups, applying a torque of 20 Ncm. Machined Co-Cr copings (M) and plastic prosthetic copings (P) were screwed onto the abutments, which received standard wax patterns. The wax patterns were cast in Co-Cr alloy (n=5), forming four groups: G1) EH/M; G2) EH/P; G3) IH/M and G4) IH/P. Four SGs were bonded onto the surface of the block tangentially to the implants, SG 1 mesially to implant 1, SG 2 and SG 3 mesially and distally to implant 2, respectively, and SG 4 distally to implant 3. The superstructure's occlusal screws were tightened onto microunit abutments with 10 Ncm torque using a manual torque driver. The magnitude of microstrain on each SG was recorded in units of microstrain (με). The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Microstrain values of each group were: G1= 338.1±223.0 με; G2= 363.9±190.9 με; G3= 415.1±53.5 IE; G4= 363.9±190.9 με. No statistically signifcant difference was found between EH and IH, regardless of the type of copings (p>0.05). The hypotheses were partially accepted. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the type of hexagonal connection and coping presented similar mechanical behavior under tightening conditions.
机译:目的:使用应变片(SG)分析,该体外研究的目的是量化三单元螺钉式种植体支持的固定局部义齿固定过程中的应变发展,改变种植体-基台关节的类型和假体的类型应付。假设六角形连接的类型会产生不同的微应变,而将假体螺丝拧紧到微单元基台上后,顶盖的类型会产生相似的微应变。材料和方法:将三个具有外部(EH)和内部(IH)六边形结构的牙科植入物插入两个聚氨酯块中。将微型单元基台拧到它们各自的植入物组上,施加20 Ncm的扭矩。机加工的Co-Cr顶盖(M)和塑料假体顶盖(P)拧到基台上,基台上有标准蜡模。蜡模铸造在Co-Cr合金中(n = 5),形成四组:G1)EH / M; G2)EH / P; G3)IH / M和G4)IH / P。将四个SG切向与种植体相切地粘合到块的表面,分别将SG 1靠近种植体1,SG 2和SG 3分别向近端和种植体2粘合,将SG 4朝远侧粘合到种植体3。使用手动扭矩驱动器将其固定在具有10 Ncm扭矩的微单元基台上。以微应变(με)为单位记录每个SG上的微应变的大小。数据通过ANOVA和Tukey检验进行统计学分析(p <0.05)。结果:各组微应变值为:G1 = 338.1±223.0με; G 2 = 363.9±190.9με; G3 = 415.1±53.5 IE; G4 = 363.9±190.9με。无论应对方式如何,在EH和IH之间均未发现统计学上的显着差异(p> 0.05)。假设被部分接受。结论:得出的结论是,六角形连接和顶盖的类型在拧紧条件下表现出相似的机械性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号