首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Oral Science >Reliability of light microscopy and a computer-assisted replica measurement technique for evaluating the fit of dental copings
【24h】

Reliability of light microscopy and a computer-assisted replica measurement technique for evaluating the fit of dental copings

机译:光学显微镜的可靠性和计算机辅助复制品测量技术,用于评估牙套的合适性

获取原文
           

摘要

Material and Methods: Sixteen CAD/CAM titanium copings were produced for a prepared maxillary canine. To modify the CAD surface model using different parameters (data density; enlargement in different directions), varying fit was created. Five light-body silicone replicas representing the gap between the canine and the coping were made for each coping and for each measurement method: (1) light microscopy measurements (LMMs); and (2) computer-assisted measurements (CASMs) using an optical digitizing system. Two investigators independently measured the marginal and internal fit using both methods. The inter-rater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] and agreement [Bland-Altman (bias) analyses]: mean of the differences (bias) between two measurements [the closer to zero the mean (bias) is, the higher the agreement between the two measurements] were calculated for several measurement points (marginal-distal, marginal-buccal, axial-buccal, incisal). For the LMM technique, one investigator repeated the measurements to determine repeatability (intra-rater reliability and agreement). Results: For inter-rater reliability, the ICC was 0.848-0.998 for LMMs and 0.945-0.999 for CASMs, depending on the measurement point. Bland-Altman bias was ?15.7 to 3.5 μm for LMMs and ?3.0 to 1.9 μm for CASMs. For LMMs, the marginal-distal and marginal-buccal measurement points showed the lowest ICC (0.848/0.978) and the highest bias (-15.7 μm/-7.6 μm). With the intra-rater reliability and agreement (repeatability) for LMMs, the ICC was 0.970-0.998 and bias was ?1.3 to 2.3 μm. Conclusion: LMMs showed lower interrater reliability and agreement at the marginal measurement points than CASMs, which indicates a more subjective influence with LMMs at these measurement points. The values, however, were still clinically acceptable. LMMs showed very high intra-rater reliability and agreement for all measurement points, indicating high repeatability.
机译:材料和方法:为准备的上颌犬制作十六个CAD / CAM钛帽。为了使用不同的参数(数据密度;沿不同方向的放大)修改CAD表面模型,创建了不同的拟合。对于每种应对方法和每种测量方法,制作了代表犬和应对之间的间隙的五个轻质有机硅仿品:(1)光学显微镜测量(LMM); (2)使用光学数字化系统的计算机辅助测量(CASM)。两名研究者使用这两种方法分别测量了边缘和内部拟合。评定者之间的可靠性[类内相关系数(ICC)]和一致性[Bland-Altman(bias)分析]:两次测量之间的差值(bias)的平均值[平均值(bias)越接近零,则越高两次测量之间的一致性]计算了几个测量点(边缘-远端,边缘-颊,轴向-颊,切齿)。对于LMM技术,一位研究人员重复了测量以确定重复性(评估者内部的可靠性和一致性)。结果:对于评估者之间的可靠性,取决于测量点,LMM的ICC为0.848-0.998,CASM的ICC为0.945-0.999。对于LMM,Bland-Altman偏差为〜15.7至3.5μm,而对于CASM,则为3.0至1.9μm。对于LMM,边缘-远侧和边缘-颊侧测量点显示最低的ICC(0.848 / 0.978)和最高的偏差(-15.7μm/ -7.6μm)。借助LMM的评估者内部可靠性和一致性(重复性),ICC为0.970-0.998,偏差为1.3至2.3μm。结论:LMM在边际测量点上显示出较差的间信度和一致性,这表明LMM在这些测量点上具有更主观的影响。但是,该值在临床上仍然可以接受。 LMM在所有测量点上均具有极高的评估者内部可靠性和一致性,表明其可重复性很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号