首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dalmatian archaeology and history: Vjesnik za Arheologiju i Povijest Dalmatinsku >Preliminary Notes on Some Economic and Social Aspects of Amphorae and Fine Ware Pottery from Central Dalmatia, 4th -1st BC
【24h】

Preliminary Notes on Some Economic and Social Aspects of Amphorae and Fine Ware Pottery from Central Dalmatia, 4th -1st BC

机译:关于公元前4日至1日来自中央达尔马提亚的安乐和精美陶器的一些经济和社会方面的初步说明

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper represents an initial attempt to present a rough outline of the vast pottery evidence from central Dalmatia. To be sure, Dalmatian Hellenistic pottery needs to be analysed in a more elaborate way, with tighter chronological controls, closer attention to the quantification of data, and better analysis of fabrics so as to infer provenience. We hope that this information will provide evidence of aspects of life that are unrecorded in the rare, and often controversial political and military histories of the East Adriatic coast. This information allows insights into what were the real production and commercial potentials of the area. The amphorae and the fine wares examined here come from a variety of contexts. We find them at sanctuary sites of Diomedes (Palagru?a and Cape Plo?a) and at the cave sanctuary at Spila Nakovana on Pelje?ac peninsula. We find them in Greek settlements at Pharos and Issa and at Issaian subcolonies at Lumbarda, Tragurion and Epetion and also on numerous sites on the island of Vis. The islands of ?olta and Bra?, which do not have Greek settlements, have also many locations where amphorae have also been found: some on farmsteads, some on native hillforts and burial mounds. At the moment we cannot clarify weather the amphorae on ?olta and Bra? represent imported wine or that it was locally produced, stored in amphorae and transported within the island, or that something else (for example olive oil) was exchanged with wine. This observation can also be valid for other islands and the coastal area of central Dalmatia. The absence of amphorae in the interior of central Dalmatia, the territory that is associated with the Illyrian tribe of Delmati, is a very intriguing problem, especially when we know that amphorae are found among the neighbours of Delmati: on Liburnian sites and among the Daorsi. Loughton (2003, 200) has correctly observed, “Clearly then, deposition biases, which include social conventions that interfere with where and how amphorae entered the archaeological record, need to be understood before we can properly interpret the distribution of Republican amphorae in France.” This could also be true for central Dalmatia, as our data mainly do not come from modern stratigraphic excavations but from random and systematic field survey. The complete English version of this paper will be published in the proceedings of the international conference “Rimini e l’Adriatico nell’ eta delle guerre puniche” that was held in Rimini from March 25th to 27th 2005.
机译:本文是对达尔马提亚中部大量陶器证据进行粗略概述的初步尝试。可以肯定的是,达尔马提亚希腊化的陶器需要以更精细的方式进行分析,包括更严格的时序控制,对数据量化的更密切关注以及对织物的更好分析,以便推断出产地。我们希望,这些信息将为东亚得里亚海沿岸罕见且经常引起争议的政治和军事历史中未记载的生活方面提供证据。这些信息可以洞悉该地区的实际生产和商业潜力。此处考察的安培瓶和精美餐具来自各种背景。我们在Diomedes(Palagru?a和Cape Plo?a)的避难所以及在佩列克(Pelje?ac)半岛的Spila Nakovana的洞穴避难所中找到它们。我们在法罗斯(Pharos)和伊萨(Issa)的希腊定居点以及伦巴第(Lurmbarda),特拉古里翁(Tragurion)和埃佩蒂翁(Epetion)的伊萨亚分殖民地以及维斯岛上的众多遗址中发现了它们。没有希腊人定居点的“奥尔塔”和“布拉”岛也有许多发现安培的地方:一些在农庄上,一些在当地的山岗和土墩上。目前,我们无法澄清天气情况,奥尔塔和布拉?代表进口的葡萄酒,或者是本地生产,存储在安瓿中并在岛内运输的葡萄酒,或者与葡萄酒进行了其他交换(例如橄榄油)。该观察结果对于其他岛屿和达尔马提亚中部沿海地区也可能有效。与达尔马提岛的伊利里亚部落有关的达尔马提亚中部内部没有安乐伞,这是一个非常令人着迷的问题,尤其是当我们知道在德尔马蒂的邻国之间发现了安乐伞时:在利本人遗址和道尔西人之间。 Loughton(2003,200)正确地观察到:“很明显,在我们正确地解释法国共和党火药的分布之前,需要理解沉积偏见,其中包括干扰火药在何处以及如何进入考古记录的社会惯例。 ”对于达尔马提亚中部地区也可能是这样,因为我们的数据主要不是来自现代地层发掘,而是来自随机和系统的现场调查。本文的完整英文版将在2005年3月25日至27日在里米尼举行的国际会议“里米尼·德·阿德里亚蒂科·内尔·埃塔·德尔·格雷·皮尼切”会议上发表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号