首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics >A Comparative drug utilization study of depression patients between tertiary care teaching hospital and private practitioners of Dehradun city, Uttarakhand
【24h】

A Comparative drug utilization study of depression patients between tertiary care teaching hospital and private practitioners of Dehradun city, Uttarakhand

机译:三级教学医院与北阿坎德邦德拉敦市私人医生之间的抑郁症患者药物利用比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Drug utilization studies are beneficial in clinical practice for rational prescribing, as there is continuous proliferation of new drugs and the increasing recognition of their delayed adverse effects. Depression is an important global public health problem thus making such studies a must for minimizing the medication errors. Aim and objectives: Present study audits the prescribing pattern of psychiatric private practitioners (PPs) vs psychiatric practitioners of tertiary care teaching hospital (TCTH) at Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Materials and methods: A total of 371 prescriptions were analysed, 196 were from collected from PPs and 175 from TCTH at Dehradun. They were analysed using WHO drug use indicators and National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM-2013). Results: Anxiolytics 150(25.25%) were most commonly prescribed by the PPs followed by antidepressants 120(20.20%) and antipsychotics 111(18.48%), whereas antidepressants 105 (27.78%) was the major drug group prescribed by TCTH followed by anxiolytics 102(26.98%) and antipsychotics 37(9.79%). Tricyclic antidepressants(TCAs) were most frequently prescribed antidepressants followed by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(SSRIs) at TCTH whereas SSRIs were the major antidepressants prescribed by PPs. Anxiolytics and anticholinergics co-prescription with antidepressants and antipsychotics respectively, was a common observation among PPs and TCTH. Analysis of prescription revealed average number of drugs prescribed per prescription in teaching hospital is 2.16 vs 3.03 among the private practitioners. 18.25% Fixed drug combinations(FDCs) were prescribed by TCTH while 0% were prescribed by PPs. 55.39% and 55.56% drugs were prescribed from the NLEM-2013 by the PPs and the TCTH respectively. Conclusion: There were lesser number of drugs prescribed per prescription and more frequent use of drug combinations at TCTH while no drug combinations and greater number of drugs per prescription were prescribed by PPs. Newer class of drugs were more frequently prescribed by PPs. Key words: Drug utilization studies, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, Fixed drug combinations.
机译:背景:药物利用研究在临床实践中对于合理开处方是有益的,因为新药不断扩散,人们越来越认识到它们的延迟副作用。抑郁症是一个重要的全球性公共卫生问题,因此使此类研究成为减少药物错误的必要条件。目的和目标:本研究对北阿坎德邦德拉敦的三级护理教学医院(TCTH)的精神科私人执业者(PPs)与精神科执业者的处方模式进行了审核。材料和方法:共分析371个处方,从Dehradun的PP中收集196个处方,从TCTH中收集175个处方。使用世卫组织药物使用指标和国家基本药物清单(NLEM-2013)对它们进行了分析。结果:PPs最常使用抗焦虑药150(25.25%),其次是抗抑郁药120(20.20%)和抗精神病药111(18.48%),而TCTH处方的主要药物类别是抗抑郁药105(27.78%),其次是抗焦虑药102 (26.98%)和抗精神病药37(9.79%)。三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)是最常用的抗抑郁药,其次是TCTH选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),而SSRIs是PP处方的主要抗抑郁药。 PP和TCTH中常见的分别是抗焦虑药和抗胆碱药与抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的共同处方。处方分析显示,在教学医院中,每张处方的平均处方药数量为2.16比3.03。 TCTH开出了18.25%的固定药物组合(FDC),而PP开出了0%的固定药物组合。 PPs和TCTH在NLEM-2013中分别开出了55.39%和55.56%的药物。结论:TCTH的处方药数量较少,药物组合的使用频率更高,而PP处方药的处方数不多,而处方药数量较多。 PPs更频繁地开辟新类别的药物。关键词:药物利用研究,抗抑郁药,抗精神病药,抗焦虑药,固定药物组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号