...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Comparison of Patient Preference for Two Insulin Injection Pen Devices in Relation to Patient Dexterity Skills
【24h】

Comparison of Patient Preference for Two Insulin Injection Pen Devices in Relation to Patient Dexterity Skills

机译:两种胰岛素注射笔设备的患者偏好与患者敏捷技巧的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Impaired dexterity has been reported to be prevalent in diabetes patients independent from the existence of diabetic neuropathy. This study was performed to investigate the impact of dexterity impairment on patient preference for two insulin pen injection devices (InnoLet and FlexTouch). Methods: Ninety patients [54 male/36 female; age (mean ± standard deviation), 62 ± 8 years; disease duration, 18 ± 11 years; hemoglobin A1c, 7.2 ± 1.0%] were included in this investigation and were stratified into four different groups based on the results of a dexterity test (Jebsen—Taylor Hand Function Test) and assessment of visual impairment: 15 type 1 (group A) and 30 type 2 (group B) patients with impaired dexterity, 30 type 1/type 2 patients with visual impairment (group C), and 15 type 1/type 2 patients without any impairment (group D). The patients performed a cognitive function test (number connection test), were introduced to the devices in random order, and were asked to perform some mock injections before completing a six-item standardized preference questionnaire. Results: There was a strong preference for FlexTouch in all groups. All unimpaired patients (100%, group D) preferred FlexTouch, as did the vast majority in all other groups. Only 11% of the patients with impaired cognitive function preferred InnoLet, as did a few patients with more severely impaired dexterity or with visual impairment (group A, 13%; group B, 3%; group C, 14%). Conclusions: Patient dexterity skills may have an influence on device preference, especially if the impairment is more pronounced.
机译:背景:据报道,在糖尿病患者中,灵活性受损普遍存在,而与糖尿病性神经病无关。进行这项研究是为了研究灵活性受损对两种胰岛素笔注射设备(InnoLet和FlexTouch)的患者偏好的影响。方法:90名患者[54男/ 36女;年龄(平均值±标准偏差),62±8岁;病程18±11年;血红蛋白A1c,7.2±1.0%]包括在这项研究中,根据敏捷度测试(杰布森-泰勒手部功能测试)和视力障碍的评估结果分为四个不同的组:15型1(A组)和30例2型(B组)肢体功能不佳患者,30例1/2型视力障碍患者(C组)和15例1/2型视力障碍患者(D组)。患者进行了认知功能测试(数字连接测试),以随机顺序被引入设备,并被要求在完成六项标准化偏好调查表之前进行一些模拟注射。结果:在所有组中,FlexTouch都很受青睐。所有未受损的患者(100%,D组)和所有其他组中的绝大多数一样,都选择FlexTouch。认知功能受损的患者中,只有11%的患者更喜欢InnoLet,而一些敏捷度严重受损或视力障碍的患者也选择了InnoLet(A组,13%; B组,3%; C组,14%)。结论:患者的敏捷性技能可能会影响设备的使用偏好,尤其是在损伤更为明显的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号