...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Data and Information Science >Measuring Scientific Productivity in China Using Malmquist Productivity Index
【24h】

Measuring Scientific Productivity in China Using Malmquist Productivity Index

机译:用Malmquist生产率指数衡量中国的科学生产率

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the scientific productivity of China’s science system.Design/methodology/approach: This paper employs the Malmquist productivity index(MPI) based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).Findings: The results reveal that the overall efficiency of Chinese universities increasedsignificantly from 2009 to 2016, which is mainly driven by technological progress. From theperspective of the functions of higher education, research and transfer activities performbetter than the teaching activities.Research limitations: As an implication, the indicator selection mechanism, investigationperiod and the MPI model can be further extended in the future research.Practical implications: The results indicate that Chinese education administrativedepartments should take actions to guide and promote the teaching activities and formulatereasonable resource allocation regulations to reach the balanced development in Chineseuniversities.Originality/value: This paper selects 58 Chinese universities and conducts a quantifiedmeasurement during the period 2009–2016. Three main functional activities of universities(i.e. teaching, researching, and application) are innovatively categorized into differentschemes, and we calculate their performance, respectively.
机译:目的:本文旨在研究中国科学系统的科学生产力。设计/方法/方法:本文使用基于数据包络分析(DEA)的Malmquist生产力指数(MPI)。从2009年到2016年,中国大学的增长显着,这主要是由技术进步推动的。从高等教育的功能来看,研究和转学活动的表现要好于教学活动。研究局限性:作为一个隐含意义,指标的选择机制,研究期限和MPI模型可以在未来的研究中进一步扩展。实际意义:结果表明中国教育行政部门应采取行动来指导和促进教学活动,并制定合理的资源分配法规,以实现中国大学的均衡发展。原创性/价值:本文选择了58所中国大学,并在2009-2016年期间进行了量化评估。大学的三个主要功能活动(即教学,研究和应用)被创新地分类为不同的方案,我们分别计算了它们的绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号