...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Data and Information Science >A comparison of citation disciplinary structure in science between the G7 countries and the BRICS countries
【24h】

A comparison of citation disciplinary structure in science between the G7 countries and the BRICS countries

机译:七国集团国家与金砖国家之间科学领域的引文学科结构比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: This study aims to compare the characteristics of citation disciplinary structurebetween the G7 countries and the BRICS countries.Design/Methodology/Approach: In this contribution, which uses about 1 million Web ofScience publications and two publications years (1993 and 2013), we compare the G7countries and the BRICS countries with regard to this type of structure. For the publicationyear 2013, cosine similarity values regarding the citation disciplinary structures of thesecountries (and of nine other countries) were used as input to cluster analysis. We also obtainedcosine similarity values for a given country and its citation disciplinary structures across thetwo publication years. Moreover, for the publication year 2013, the within-country JeffreysMatusita distance between publication and citation disciplinary structure was measured.Research limitations: First, the citation disciplinary structures of countries depend onmultiple and complex factors. It is therefore difficult to completely explain the formation andchange of the citation disciplinary structure of a country. This study suggests some possiblecauses, whereas detailed explanations might be given by future research. Second, the lengthof the citation window used in this study is three years. However, scientific disciplines differin their citation practices. Comparison between citations across disciplines using the samecitation window length may affect the citation discipline structure results for some countries.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较G7国家和金砖国家之间的引用学科结构的特征。设计/方法/方法:在这项贡献中,我们使用了约100万本Web of Science出版物和两年的出版物(1993年和2013年),比较七国集团国家和金砖国家在这种类型的结构上。在2013年出版年,这些国家(及其他9个国家)的引用学科结构的余弦相似度值被用作聚类分析的输入。我们还获得了特定国家/地区及其在两个出版年中的引用学科结构的余弦相似度值。此外,对于2013年出版年,还测量了国家内部的JeffreysMatusita出版物与引证学科结构之间的距离。研究局限性:首先,各国的引证学科结构取决于多重和复杂因素。因此,很难完全解释一个国家的引用学科结构的形成和变化。这项研究提出了一些可能的原因,而未来的研究可能会给出详细的解释。其次,本研究中使用的引文窗口的时间为三年。但是,科学学科在引用方式上有所不同。使用相同的引用窗口长度对不同学科之间的引用进行比较可能会影响某些国家的引用学科结构结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号