首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Sciences >Comparative analysis of guided bone regeneration using autogenous tooth bone graft material with and?without resorbable membrane
【24h】

Comparative analysis of guided bone regeneration using autogenous tooth bone graft material with and?without resorbable membrane

机译:带或不带可吸收膜的自体牙骨移植材料引导下骨再生的对比分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/purpose The use of membrane in preventing soft tissue ingrowth during guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure for better clinical results is controversial. The present study compares and analyzes the clinical results of GBR using the autogenous tooth bone graft (AutoBT; Korea Tooth Bank Co., Seoul, Korea) material with and without the resorbable membrane (Bio-Arm, ACE Surgical. Supply Company, Inc., USA). Materials and methods Patients who received dental implants with simultaneous GBR from the same clinician at the Dental Department of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from March 2009 to May 2012 were selected in this study. A total of 20 patients with a total number of 30 dental implants were included in this study. The patients who received GBR with resorbable membrane were in Group 1 and those without membrane were in Group 2. AutoBT was grafted in all patients. In each group, pre- and postoperative bone loss, regeneration in percentage (%), and complications were evaluated. Results There was no statistically significant difference in pre- and postoperative reduction of bone defect height, bone level change, and bone regeneration in percentage (%) between the two groups (P?>?0.05). Conclusion Both groups showed clinically acceptable bone regeneration without any?eventful complications. Within the limitation of this study, we can carefully conclude that the use of resorbable membrane is not a critical factor in GBR when using AutoBT.
机译:背景/目的在引导性骨再生(GBR)过程中使用膜预防软组织向内生长以获得更好的临床效果是有争议的。本研究比较并分析了使用自体牙骨移植物(AutoBT;韩国牙银行,韩国首尔)和有无可吸收膜的材料(生物血管,ACE Surgical.Supply Company,Inc)的GBR的临床结果。 , 美国)。材料和方法选择2009年3月至2012年5月在首尔国立大学盆唐医院牙科科接受同一位临床医生同期GBR种植的患者。这项研究共纳入20例患者,总共30颗牙种植体。接受带可吸收膜GBR的患者在第1组,没有膜的GBR患者在第2组。在每组中,评估术前和术后的骨丢失,再生百分比(%)和并发症。结果两组患者术前和术后骨缺损高度降低,骨水平变化和骨再生百分比(%)之间差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。结论两组均显示临床可接受的骨再生,无任何并发症。在本研究的范围内,我们可以仔细得出结论:使用AutoBT时,可吸收膜的使用不是GBR的关键因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号