首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >Retrospective analysis of 55,769 HbA1c EQA results obtained from professional laboratories and medical offices participating in surveys organized by two European EQA centers over a nine-year periodSUP?/SUP
【24h】

Retrospective analysis of 55,769 HbA1c EQA results obtained from professional laboratories and medical offices participating in surveys organized by two European EQA centers over a nine-year periodSUP?/SUP

机译:回顾分析了两个欧洲EQA中心在9年内从专业实验室和医疗机构参加的调查中获得的55,769份HbA1c EQA结果

获取原文
           

摘要

External Quality Assessment (EQA) is an essential tool for laboratories to monitor the performances of their analyses. It also allows a comparison of methods and types of laboratories (professional laboratories vs. medical offices). We, therefore, compared 55,769 HbA1c EQA results obtained between 1999 and 2008 by laboratories participating in EQA schemes organized by two European centers, Switzerland (center 1) and France (center 2). We used simple, nonparametrical statistics suited to EQA results to calculate the yearly and global precision performances. All the results, including the outliers, were included in the calculations. The best global precision performances were obtained by professional laboratories and medical offices using DCA POCT devices, followed byprofessional laboratories with the Integra, Hitachi, Cobas Mira, and HPLC groups of devices, and finally by both types of laboratories with the NycoCard POCT devices. When considering yearly precision performances, an overall improvement over time was observed for almost all diagnostic devices of center 1, whereas the trend was less clear for center 2. The HbA1c EQA results collected and analyzed over a 9-year period showed that the DCA POCT devices used either by professional laboratories or medical offices had better reproducibility than laboratory devices (other than POCT) and that a general improvement of yearly precision performances was observed, especially when frequent EQA schemes were organized. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 25:337–343, 2011. ? 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:外部质量评估(EQA)是实验室监控其分析性能的重要工具。它还可以比较实验室的方法和类型(专业实验室与医疗室)。因此,我们比较了1999年至2008年间参加由两个欧洲中心(瑞士(中心1)和法国(中心2))组织的EQA计划的实验室获得的55,769 HbA1c EQA结果。我们使用适合EQA结果的简单,非参数统计数据来计算年度和全球精度绩效。所有结果(包括异常值)都包括在计算中。专业实验室和医疗机构使用DCA POCT设备获得了最佳的全球精度性能,其次是使用Integra,Hitachi,Cobas Mira和HPLC组设备的专业实验室,最后是使用NycoCard POCT设备的两种类型的实验室。当考虑年度精度性能时,对于中心1的几乎所有诊断设备,随着时间的推移总体上得到了改善,而中心2的趋势却不太明显。在9年的时间里收集和分析的HbA1c EQA结果表明DCA POCT由专业实验室或医疗机构使用的设备具有比实验室设备(POCT除外)更好的可重复性,并且观察到了年度精度性能的总体提高,尤其是在组织频繁的EQA计划时。 J.临床。实验室肛门25:337–343,2011.? 2011年Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号