...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Ability of three desensitizing agents in dentinal tubule obliteration and durability: An in vitro study
【24h】

Ability of three desensitizing agents in dentinal tubule obliteration and durability: An in vitro study

机译:三种脱敏剂在牙本质小管闭塞和持久性方面的能力:一项体外研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule obliteration and their durability in use on the dentinal tubules. Materials and Methods: Sixty specimens were obtained from 30 extracted sound human maxillary first premolars. Each tooth was mesiodistally sectioned to obtain 30 buccal and 30 lingual surfaces, and enamel was removed in order to simulate hypersensitive dentin. Specimens were divided into four groups with 15 specimens each. Group 1 samples were immersed in artificial saliva, Group 2 samples were coated with Vivasens, Group 3 samples were coated with VOCO Admira Protect, and Group 4 samples were coated with Neo Active Apatite suspension. These specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM) to find out the occluding ability of the respective products. The specimens were brushed to find out their durability for 1 week and 1 month and were examined under SEM. Statistical Analysis: The results were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test. Results: Group 1 differed significantly from the Vivasens, Admira, and Neo Active Apatite groups at 5% level of significance ( P < 0.05). The Vivasens group differed significantly from the Admira and Neo Active Apatite groups at 5% level of significance ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: The Ormocer-based Admira Protect showed the best results.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估三种脱敏剂对牙本质小管闭塞的有效性及其在牙本质小管上使用的持久性。材料和方法:从30个提取的人上颌第一前磨牙获得60个标本。将每个牙齿进行近中切,以获得30个颊面和30个舌面,并去除牙釉质以模拟牙本质过敏症。标本分为四组,每组15个标本。将第1组样品浸入人工唾液中,第2组样品用Vivasens包衣,第3组样品用VOCO Admira Protect包衣,第4组样品用Neo Active磷灰石悬浮液包衣。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下检查这些样品,以找出各个产品的吸留能力。刷样品以找出其在1周和1个月的耐久性,并在SEM下检查。统计分析:通过方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验对结果进行统计分析。结果:第1组与Vivasens,Admira和Neo Active Apatite组的显着性水平差异为5%(P <0.05)。 Vivasens组与Admira组和Neo Active Apatite组之间的显着性差异为5%(P <0.05)。结论:基于Ormocer的Admira Protect表现出最佳效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号