...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study
【24h】

Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study

机译:唾液污染和去污程序对自蚀刻牙本质粘结系统的剪切粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective:This study aims to evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of two self-etch dentine bonding systems and also investigate the effect of decontamination procedure on the recovery of bond strength.Materials and Methods:Sixty premolars extracted for orthodontic reason were obtained and the buccal surfaces of teeth were reduced to create a flat dentine surface. The samples were randomly divided into three sub-groups for AdheSE (ASE) (Ivoclar – Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and three sub-groups for Adper Prompt Self-Etch Adhesive (ADP) (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) of 10 each. For AdheSE (ASE); ASE-I was the control group (primer applied to fresh dentine surface), ASE-II was the contamination group (primer applied, followed by saliva contamination and then air dried) and ASE-III was the decontamination group (primer applied, followed by saliva contamination, air dried and then primer reapplied). For Adper Prompt (ADP); ADP-I was the control group (self-etch adhesive applied to fresh dentine surface), ADP-II was the contamination group (self-etch adhesive applied, followed by saliva contamination and then air dried) and ADP-III was the decontamination group (self-etch adhesive applied, followed by saliva contamination, air dried and then self-etch adhesive reapplied). Followed by the bonding procedure, a 5 mm composite resin block with Filtek P-60 (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) was built on the substrate. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested with Instron Universal testing machine (Instron Corporation, Canton, MA, USA) with a cross head speed of 1 mm per minute. Data obtained was subjected to one way ANOVA test, while the inter group comparison was made using Tukey’s multiple comparison and Unpaired t-test.Results:In AdhSE group (ASE), the sub-group ASE-II (contamination group) [5.4 ± 2.2 MPa] showed lower SBS than ASE-I [11.8 ± 2.6 MPa] and ASE-III [8.9 ± 3.3 MPa], which was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the bond strength between the ASE-I (control group) and ASE-III (decontamination group). In Adper Prompt group (ADP), there was a severe decrease of bond strength in ADP-II (contamination group) [4.6 ± 1.1 MPa] when compared to ADP-I (control group) [7.4 ± 1.4 MPa] and ADP-III (decontamination subgroup) [14.1 ± 2.2 MPa] which was statistically significant. The bond strength of ADP-III wherein Adper Prompt bonding agent was reapplied after salivary contamination was found to be statistically significant than ADP-I and ADP-II.Conclusion:Saliva contamination reduces the dentine bond strength of both the self-etch systems; AdheSE and Adper Prompt. Re-application of the primer for the AdheSE and re-application of the adhesive for the Adper Prompt after air drying the saliva off can recover the dentine bond strength. In the Adper Prompt group, the added application of adhesives to decontaminate saliva not only recovered the bond strength but also improved it significantly.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估唾液污染对两种自酸蚀型牙本质粘合系统的剪切粘合强度的影响,并研究去污工艺对粘合强度恢复的影响。材料与方法:六十颗正畸前磨牙获得牙齿的牙齿颊面以形成平坦的牙本质表面。样品被随机分为AdheSE(ASE)的三个子组(Ivoclar – Vivadent,Schaan,列支敦士登)和Adper Prompt自蚀刻胶粘剂(ADP)的三个子组(3M ESPE,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗)每个10个。对于AdheSE(ASE); ASE-I是对照组(在新鲜的牙质表面上涂底漆),ASE-II是污染组(在涂底漆后再进行唾液污染,然后风干),ASE-III是去污组(在涂底漆后再进行干燥)唾液污染,风干,然后重新涂底漆)。对于及时提示(ADP); ADP-I是对照组(在新鲜的牙本质表面上使用自蚀刻胶粘剂),ADP-II是污染组(在应用自蚀刻胶粘剂后再进行唾液污染,然后风干),ADP-III是去污组(施加自蚀刻粘合剂,然后唾液污染,风干,然后重新施加自蚀刻粘合剂)。然后进行粘合程序,在基材上构建一个带有Filtek P-60(3M ESPE,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗)的5毫米复合树脂块。剪切粘结强度(SBS)使用Instron Universal测试仪(Instron Corporation,加拿大马萨诸塞州坎顿)以每分钟1毫米的十字头速度进行测试。获得的数据经过单向ANOVA测试,而组间比较则通过Tukey多重比较和不成对t检验进行。结果:在AdhSE组(ASE)中,亚组ASE-II(污染组)[5.4± 2.2 MPa]的SBS低于ASE-I [11.8±2.6 MPa]和ASE-III [8.9±3.3 MPa],具有统计学意义。 ASE-I(对照组)和ASE-III(去污组)之间的粘合强度没有显着差异。在Adper Prompt组(ADP)中,与ADP-I(对照组)[7.4±1.4 MPa]和ADP-III相比,ADP-II(污染组)的粘结强度严重降低[4.6±1.1 MPa] (去污亚组)[14.1±2.2 MPa],具有统计学意义。发现唾液污染后重新应用Adper Prompt粘接剂的ADP-III的粘接强度在统计学上显着高于ADP-I和ADP-II。结论:唾液污染会降低两个自蚀刻系统的牙本质粘接强度。 AdheSE和Adper提示。唾液风干后,重新使用AdheSE底漆和重新使用Adper Prompt粘合剂可以恢复牙本质粘合强度。在Adper Prompt组中,添加粘合剂以净化唾液不仅恢复了粘合强度,而且显着提高了粘合强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号