...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) >Desfechos de longo prazo do tamp?o de fístula (Gore) versus ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana (LIFT) para fístula anal
【24h】

Desfechos de longo prazo do tamp?o de fístula (Gore) versus ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana (LIFT) para fístula anal

机译:瘘管栓塞(Gore)的长期结局与括约肌间瘘管(LIFT)结扎肛瘘的远期结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The surgical treatment of anal fistula is complex due to the possibility of fecal incontinence. Fistulotomy and cutting Setons have the same incidence of fecal incontinence depending on the complexity of the fistula. Sphincter-preserving procedures such as anal fistula plug and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure may result in more recurrence requiring repeated operations. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of treating fistula in Ano utilizing two methods: Fistula plug (Gore Bio-A) and ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT). Methods: Fifty four patients (33 males; 21 female, median ages 42 [range 32-47] years) with high anal inter-transphenteric fistula were treated with LIFT and fistula plug procedures from September 2011 until August 2016 by a single surgeon and were retrospectively evaluated. All were followed for a median of 23.9 (range 4-54) months with clinical examination. Twenty one patients underwent fistula plug and 33 patients underwent LIFT procedure (4 patients of the LIFT group underwent LIFT and rectal mucosa advancement flap). The healing rate and complications were evaluated clinically and through telephone calls. Results: The mean operative time for the Plug was 25 ± 17 min and for the LIFT was 40 ± 20 min ( p = 0.017) and the mean hospital stay was 2.4 ± 1.1 and 1.9 ± 0.3 ( p = 0.01) respectively. The early complications of the plug and LIFT procedures included; anal pain (33.3%, 66.6%, p = 0.13), perianal discharge (77.8%, 91%, p = 0.62), anal pruritus (38.9%, 50.0%, p = 0.71) and bleeding per rectum (16.7%, 33.3%, p = 0.39) respectively. The overall mean follow-up was 20.9 ± 16.8 months, p = 0.68. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (21.9 ± 7.5 months, 19.9 ± 16.1 months, p = 0.682). The healing rate was 76.2% (16/21 patients) in the fistula plug group and 81.1% (27/33 patients) in the LIFT group ( p = 0.73). Patients who had LIFT procedure and a mucosal advancement flap had 100% healing rate (4 out of 4 patients). No incontinence of stool or feces and no fistula plug expulsion were seen in our patients. The healing time ranged from 1 to 6 months after surgery. There was no post-operative perianal abscess, cellulitis or pain. Conclusions: LIFT and anal plug are safe procedures for patients with primary and recurrent anal fistula. Both techniques showed excellent results in terms of healing and complication rate. None of our patients had incontinence after 5 years follow-up. The best success rate in our patients was seen after LIFT procedure with mucosal advancement flap. Larger and controlled randomized trials are needed for better assessment of treatment options.
机译:背景:由于存在大便失禁的可能性,肛瘘的外科治疗很复杂。根据瘘管的复杂程度,Fistulototomy和切割Setons具有相同的粪便失禁发生率。保留括约肌的手术(例如肛门瘘塞和结扎括约肌间的瘘管手术)可能会导致更多的复发,需要重复手术。这项研究的目的是评估和比较使用两种方法治疗Ano瘘的结果:瘘管塞(Gore Bio-A)和括约肌间结扎术(LIFT)。方法:2011年9月至2016年8月,由一名外科医生采用LIFT和瘘管插管手术治疗54例高位肛门跨经瘘瘘管患者(男33例,女21例,中位年龄42 [范围32-47]岁)。回顾性评估。所有患者均接受了临床检查,中位数为23.9个月(范围4-54)。 21例患者行了瘘管瘘塞手术,33例患者进行了LIFT手术(LIFT组的4例患者接受了LIFT和直肠粘膜前移瓣)。通过临床和电话评估治愈率和并发症。结果:Plug的平均手术时间为25±17 min,LIFT的平均手术时间为40±20 min(p = 0.017),平均住院时间分别为2.4±1.1和1.9±0.3(p = 0.01)。包括即插即用和LIFT程序的早期并发症;肛门疼痛(33.3%,66.6%,p = 0.13),肛周出院(77.8%,91%,p = 0.62),肛门瘙痒(38.9%,50.0%,p = 0.71)和每个直肠出血(16.7%,33.3) %,p = 0.39)。总体平均随访时间为20.9±16.8个月,p = 0.68。两组之间无统计学差异(21.9±7.5个月,19.9±16.1个月,p = 0.682)。瘘管塞组的治愈率为76.2%(16/21例),而LIFT组的治愈率为81.1%(27/33例)(p = 0.73)。进行LIFT手术和黏膜前移瓣的患者治愈率为100%(4名患者中有4名)。在我们的患者中未见大便或粪便失禁,未见瘘管堵塞排出。术后1至6个月不等。术后无肛周脓肿,蜂窝组织炎或疼痛。结论:LIFT和肛塞是治疗原发性和复发性肛瘘的安全方法。两种技术在治愈和并发症发生率方面均显示出极好的效果。我们的患者均未在5年的随访后出现大小便失禁。在我们的患者中,LIFT术后行粘膜前移皮瓣的成功率最高。为了更好地评估治疗方案,需要更大且受控的随机试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号