...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. >Comparing six antihypertensive medication classes for preventing new‐onset diabetes mellitus among hypertensive patients: a network meta‐analysis
【24h】

Comparing six antihypertensive medication classes for preventing new‐onset diabetes mellitus among hypertensive patients: a network meta‐analysis

机译:比较六种降压药物类别以预防高血压患者的新发糖尿病:网络荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Hypertensive patients usually have a higher risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NOD) which may trigger cardiovascular diseases. In this study, the effectiveness of six antihypertensive agents with respect to NOD prevention in hypertensive patients was assessed. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of specific drug classes. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles. Results of the pairwised meta-analysis were illustrated by odd ratios (OR) and a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The probabilities and outcome of each treatment were ranked and summarized using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).Twenty-three trials were identified, including 224,832 patients with an average follow-up period of 3.9 ± 1.0 years. The network meta-analysis showed that patients treated by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were associated with a lower risk of NOD compared to placebo (PCB), calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and β-blockers, while diuretic appeared to be ineffective for NOD prevention. Network meta-analysis results of specific drugs showed that enalapril exhibited distinct advantages and hydrochlorothiazide also exhibited a reliable performance. Our results suggested that both ARBs and angiotensin converse enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), especially candesartan and enalapril, were preferable for NOD prevention in hypertensive patients. Hydrochlorothiazide also exhibited a reliable performance in comparison with other agents.
机译:摘要高血压患者通常具有较高的新发糖尿病(NOD)风险,可能引发心血管疾病。在这项研究中,评估了六种降压药对高血压患者NOD预防的有效性。进行网络荟萃分析以比较特定药物类别的功效。在PubMed和Embase数据库中搜索相关文章。成对的荟萃分析结果用奇数比(OR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)进行说明。使用累积等级曲线(SUCRA)下的表面对每种治疗的概率和结果进行分级和总结。确定了23项试验,包括224,832例患者,平均随访时间为3.9±1.0年。网络荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂(PCB),钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和β-阻滞剂相比,接受血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗的患者发生NOD的风险较低,而利尿剂似乎对预防NOD。特定药物的网络荟萃分析结果表明,依那普利具有明显的优势,而氢氯噻嗪也具有可靠的性能。我们的研究结果表明,ARBs和血管紧张素逆转酶抑制剂(ACEIs),特别是坎地沙坦和依那普利,对于预防高血压患者的NOD更为可取。与其他试剂相比,氢氯噻嗪也表现出可靠的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号