...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Comparison of Clinical Manifestations, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns, and Mutations of Fluoroquinolone Target Genes between Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and Elizabethkingia anophelis Isolated in Taiwan
【24h】

Comparison of Clinical Manifestations, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns, and Mutations of Fluoroquinolone Target Genes between Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and Elizabethkingia anophelis Isolated in Taiwan

机译:台湾分离的脑膜炎伊利沙伯病和伊利沙金伊蚊的临床表现,抗菌药物敏感性模式和氟喹诺酮靶基因突变的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and Elizabethkingia anophelis are two major pathogens in the genus Elizabethkingia . Studies have revealed that Elizabethkingia anophelis is frequently misidentified as E. meningoseptica . Therefore, our aim was to explore the clinical and molecular differences between these two species. The database of a clinical microbiology laboratory in a university-affiliated hospital of Taiwan was searched to identify patients with Elizabethkingia infections between January 2005 and June 2018. Species were reidentified using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Twenty E. meningoseptica and 72 E. anophelis samples were collected from consecutive patients. E. meningoseptica was significantly more frequently isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid than was E. anophelis . The most susceptible antibiotic for all Elizabethkingia isolates was minocycline (91.3%), followed by levofloxacin (52.2%), tigecycline (23.9%), and piperacillin tazobactam (23.9%). Compared with E. anophelis , E. meningoseptica was significantly less susceptible to piperacillin tazobactam, minocycline, and levofloxacin. Regarding nonsynonymous substitutions in the quinolone-resistance determining regions of DNA gyrase, six sites were recognized in E. meningoseptica and one site was recognized in E. anophelis . E. meningoseptica had a significantly higher rate of fluoroquinolone target gene mutations than did E. anophelis . Because of less susceptibility to multiple antibiotics than E. anophelis , empirical antimicrobial therapy of E. meningoseptica should be more rigorous.
机译:脑膜炎沙门氏菌和伊蚊伊利沙伯菌是伊利沙丁菌属的两个主要病原体。研究表明,伊丽莎白女王按蚊经常被误认为是脑膜炎大肠杆菌。因此,我们的目的是探索这两个物种之间的临床和分子差异。搜索台湾一家大学附属医院的临床微生物实验室的数据库,以鉴定2005年1月至2018年6月之间患有伊丽莎白病的患者。使用16S核糖体RNA基因测序对物种进行了重新鉴定。从连续的患者中收集了二十个脑膜炎大肠杆菌和72个按蚊大肠杆菌样品。从脑脊液中分离到的脑膜炎大肠杆菌的频率比嗜人肠球菌的明显更高。对于所有伊丽莎白病分离株,最易感的抗生素是米诺环素(91.3%),其次是左氧氟沙星(52.2%),替加环素(23.9%)和哌拉西林他唑巴坦(23.9%)。与按蚊按蚊相比,脑膜炎按eptic对哌拉西林他唑巴坦,米诺环素和左氧氟沙星的敏感性要低得多。关于在DNA促旋酶的喹诺酮抗性确定区域中的非同义取代,在脑膜炎大肠杆菌中识别了六个位点,在按蚊中识别了一个位点。与嗜人肠球菌相比,脑膜炎大肠杆菌的氟喹诺酮类靶基因突变的发生率要高得多。由于对多种抗生素的敏感性不如按蚊E. anophelis,因此对E. meningoseptica的经验性抗菌治疗应更加严格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号