...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : >The association between cardiovascular risk and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of fibrosis: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
【24h】

The association between cardiovascular risk and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of fibrosis: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

机译:心血管风险与纤维化的心血管磁共振测量之间的关联:动脉粥样硬化(MESA)的多民族研究

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundRisk scores for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are in common use to integrate multiple cardiovascular risk factors in order to identify individuals at greatest risk for disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if individuals at greater cardiovascular risk have T1 mapping indices by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) indicative of greater myocardial fibrosis.MethodsCVD risk scores for 1208 subjects (men, 50.8%) ages 55–94 years old were evaluated in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) at six centers. T1 times were determined at 1.5Tesla before and after gadolinium administration (0.15?mmol/kg) using a modified Look-Locker pulse sequence. The relationship between CMR measures (native T1, 12 and 25?minute post-gadolinium T1, partition coefficient and extracellular volume fraction) and 14 established different cardiovascular risk scores were determined using regression analysis. Bootstrapping analysis with analysis of variance was used to compare different CMR measures. CVD risk scores were significantly different for men and women (p?
机译:背景技术心血管疾病(CVD)的风险评分通常用于整合多个心血管疾病危险因素,以识别出疾病风险最高的个体。这项研究的目的是通过心血管磁共振(CMR)来确定心血管风险较高的个体是否具有T1定位指数,表明心肌纤维化程度更高。方法对1208名年龄在55-94岁的受试者(男性,占50.8%)进行CVD风险评分在六个中心的动脉粥样硬化多种族研究(MESA)中进行了评估。使用改良的Look-Locker脉冲序列在施用ado之前和之后(1.5?mmol / kg)在1.5Tesla下确定T1时间。使用回归分析确定CMR量度(天然T1 、,后12和25分钟T1,分配系数和细胞外体积分数)与14种建立的不同心血管风险评分之间的关​​系。使用自举分析和方差分析来比较不同的CMR度量。男性和女性的CVD风险评分显着不同(p <0.001)。结果g T1时间后25分钟,与其他CMR指数(例如,自然)相比,与风险评分的统计显着相关性(10/14评分,​​71%)。男性的T1(7/14得分,50%)和分配系数(7/14,50%)。风险得分,特别是2013年新的AHA / ASCVD风险得分,与任何CMR纤维化指数均不相关。风险具有较高的心肌纤维化CMR指数;与ECV和天然T1时间相比,在更长的延迟时间(25分钟)处进行T1时间与常用风险评分指数的一致性更好。 /,NCT00005487。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号