首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business & Financial Affairs >An Approach to the Problem of Authority
【24h】

An Approach to the Problem of Authority

机译:权威问题探讨

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper examines the central problem of authority as illustrated through the lenses of philosophical anarchism. The justification of authority constitutes the paramount problem of political philosophy. The philosophical debate on political obligation, initiated by defenders of the state and anarchists, concerns the justification of a special bond between citizens and political institutions and lies at the centre of the discussion on authority. Philosophical anarchism’s criticism of political obligation creates great difficulties to state justification. Yet, this anarchist strand has been dismissed as a merely negative critique of political authority, with no alternative positive proposal of its own. In disagreement with this view, this paper aims at improving our idea of authority by revealing the value of the anarchist approach.For this I focus on the position of critical philosophical anarchism and on three theorists each of whom relates in a significant way to this position. I discuss Rousseau as a traditional theorist whose view is a basic inspiration for the anarchist approach to political institutions. Joseph Raz’s theory is analyzed as a view largely compatible with critical philosophical anarchism’s perspective on state authority. Finally, I discuss Simmons as a representative critical philosophical anarchist, from whose approach, however, I depart in my defense of critical philosophical anarchism.My conclusion is that critical philosophical anarchism sheds a new light on the important insights on authority offered by the above theorists and helps us adopt a new perspective on political institutions. In contrast with political anarchism, it does not propose to overthrow the state. Yet it justifies the former by establishing an everlasting criticism of authority. The absence of political obligation reaffirms the responsibility of citizenship. This entails a responsibility on our part, whether anarchists or not, to participate in evaluating continually authority’s decisions and practices, toward a better political world.
机译:本文通过哲学无政府主义的角度考察了权威的中心问题。权威的正当性构成了政治哲学的首要问题。由国家的捍卫者和无政府主义者发起的关于政治义务的哲学辩论,涉及公民与政治机构之间特殊纽带的合理性,并且是关于权力的讨论的中心。哲学无政府主义对政治义务的批评给陈述国家辩解带来了很大的困难。但是,这种无政府主义的派系只不过是对政治权威的消极批评而已,没有自己的替代性积极建议。与这种观点不同的是,本文旨在通过揭示无政府主义方法的价值来改善我们的权威观念。为此,我着重于批判哲学无政府主义的立场以及三位理论家中的每一个都与这一立场有重要关系。我将卢梭作为一个传统的理论家进行讨论,他的观点是无政府主义者研究政治制度的基本灵感。约瑟夫·拉兹(Joseph Raz)的理论被分析为与批判哲学无政府主义关于国家权威的观点大为兼容的观点。最后,我以席梦思为代表的批判性哲学无政府主义者进行了讨论,但是从他的观点出发,我捍卫了批判性哲学无政府主义。我的结论是,批判性哲学无政府主义为上述理论家提供的关于权威的重要见解提供了新的视角。并帮助我们对政治制度采取新的观点。与政治无政府主义相反,它没有提议推翻国家。然而,它通过建立对权威的永恒批评来为前者辩护。没有政治义务重申了公民责任。无论是无政府主义者还是无政府主义者,这都意味着我们有责任参与不断评估当局的决策和做法,以建立一个更好的政治世界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号