首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Breast Cancer >The Result of Evaluation According to Radioactivity of Sequential Sentinel Nodes Biopsy in Breast cancer
【24h】

The Result of Evaluation According to Radioactivity of Sequential Sentinel Nodes Biopsy in Breast cancer

机译:乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检放射性评价结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose Radio-guided sentinel node biopsy has become a standard method for evaluating the axillary status. However, there is no guideline for the optimum extent of sentinel lymphadenectomy. The object of this study was to assess the probability of metastases according to the sequence of radioactivity in the sentinel nodes and to determine the accuracy of the methods for evaluating metastases. Methods 80 consenting patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy using 99mTc-phytate. All the lymph nodes that showed radioactivity higher than surroundings were excised and labeled as SN1 to SN5 according to the sequential radioactivity. All the excised sentinel nodes were evaluated by frozen sectioning (FS) and permanent sectioning (PS). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy of the procedure were then analyzed according to the evaluation method. Results All 80 patients showed a variable number of axillary sentinel node sites (SN1-SN5) and 19 patients (23.8%) had three or more sentinel node sites, with an average number of 1.98. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and accuracy were higher on PS (94.4%, 100%, 98.4% and 98.8% respectively) than on FS (88.9%, 100%, 96.9% and 97.5% respectively). 20 patients were found to have metastatic breast cancer within the sentinel lymph nodes by IHC, but one case of a metastatic, non-sentinel node was found in the 60 patients with negative sentinel nodes, so that the final false negative rate was 4.8%. In 18 of the 20 sentinel node-positive patients(90.0%), the most radioactive lymph node (SN1) was a positive node. The removal of the most radioactive sentinel node and the 2nd most radioactive sentinel node accurately staged all 20 sentinel node-positive patients. Conclusion Careful evaluation of the sentinel nodes with FS, PS and IHC study is essential to reduce the false negative results. In addition, excision of the highest and the 2nd highest lymph nodes is essential and the excision of the 3rd highest node if any, should also be considered for obtaining a better treatment results.
机译:目的放射性引导前哨淋巴结活检已成为评估腋窝状态的标准方法。但是,目前尚无关于最佳前哨淋巴结清扫术范围的指南。本研究的目的是根据前哨淋巴结中放射性的顺序评估转移的可能性,并确定评估转移方法的准确性。方法采用 99m Tc-植酸盐对80例同意患者进行前哨淋巴结活检。切除所有放射性高于周围环境的淋巴结,并根据顺序放射性标记为SN1至SN5。所有切除的前哨淋巴结均通过冷冻切片(FS)和永久切片(PS)进行评估。然后根据评估方法分析该方法的敏感性,特异性,阴性预测值和准确性。结果80例患者均出现数量不等的腋前哨淋巴结位点(SN1-SN5),其中19例患者(23.8%)有3个或更多的前哨淋巴结位点,平均1.98个。 PS的敏感性,特异性,NPV和准确性更高(分别为94.4%,100%,98.4%和98.8%),而FS则更高(分别为88.9%,100%,96.9%和97.5%)。通过IHC发现20例患者在前哨淋巴结内有转移性乳腺癌,但在60例前哨淋巴结阴性的患者中发现1例转移性非前哨淋巴结,因此最终假阴性率为4.8%。 20名前哨淋巴结阳性患者中有18名(90.0%),放射性最高的淋巴结(SN1)是阳性淋巴结。放射性最高的前哨淋巴结和第二放射性最高的前哨淋巴结的清除准确地分期了所有20名前哨淋巴结阳性患者。结论FS,PS和IHC研究仔细评估前哨淋巴结对于减少假阴性结果至关重要。此外,切除最高和第二高的淋巴结是必不可少的,还应考虑切除最高的第三淋巴结,以获得更好的治疗效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号