首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery >The “cut-in patch-out” technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
【24h】

The “cut-in patch-out” technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study

机译:Pancoast肿瘤切除术的“切入修补”技术可减轻术后疼痛:一项病例对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure (?cut-in patch-out?) thereby avoiding a separate thoracotomy with rib spreading. We undertook a study to compare outcomes of this novel ?cut-in patch-out? technique with traditional thoracotomy for patients with Pancoast tumors. Methods We retrospectively identified 41 patients undergoing surgical resection of Pancoast tumors requiring en-bloc removal of at least 3 ribs at our institution from 1999 to 2012. Surgery was accomplished by either a ?cut-in patch-out? technique (n?=?25) or traditional posterolateral thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection (n?=?16). Multiple variables including patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, extent of resection, and pathology were analyzed with respect to outcomes from morbidity, narcotic use, and oncologic perspectives. Results Baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, and perioperative factors including extent of surgery, complete resections (R0), nodal status and lymph node number, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the two groups. The mean duration of out-patient narcotic use was significantly lower in the ?cut-in patch-out? group compared to the thoracotomy group (80.6 days?±?62.4 vs. 158.2 days?±?119.2, p?100 days). Additionally, five year survival for the ?cut-in patch-out? group was 48% versus the traditional group at 12.5% (p?=?0.04). Conclusions Compared with a traditional thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection approach for P-NSCLC, a ?cut-in patch-out? technique offers an alternative approach that appears to have at least oncologic equivalence while decreasing pain. We have more recently adapted this technique to select patients with pulmonary neoplasms involving chest wall invasion and believe further investigation is warranted.
机译:背景技术自2001年以来,我们已经针对Pancoast肿瘤采用了一种新颖的手术方法,其中通过胸壁缺损直接进行肺叶切除和纵隔淋巴结清扫术。然后在手术完成时修补缺损(“切入修补”),从而避免单独的胸廓切开术并肋骨扩散。我们进行了一项研究,以比较这种新型“切入式插补”的结果。传统开胸手术技术治疗Pancoast肿瘤。方法我们回顾性分析了1999年至2012年间在我院接受手术切除的Pancoast肿瘤的41例患者,这些患者需要大块切除至少3条肋骨。手术采用“切开修补”的方法完成。术(n≥25)或传统的后外侧开胸手术和单独的胸壁切除术(n≥16)。从发病率,麻醉剂使用和肿瘤学角度,对患者的人口统计学,新辅助治疗,切除范围和病理学等多个变量进行了分析。结果两组的人口统计学,新辅助疗法和围手术期因素(包括手术范围,完全切除(R0),淋巴结状态和淋巴结数目,发病率和死亡率)相似。在“插入式修补”中,门诊麻醉药的平均使用时间显着降低。与开胸手术组相比(80.6天±62.4 vs. 158.2天±119.2,p <100天)。此外,“插入式修补程序”可以生存五年。组为48%,而传统组为12.5%(p?=?0.04)。结论与传统的开胸手术和单独的胸壁切除术相比,P-NSCLC的“切开修补”效果更好。技术提供了一种替代方法,该方法似乎在减轻疼痛的同时至少具有肿瘤等效性。我们最近对这种技术进行了调整,以选择涉及胸壁浸润的肺部肿瘤患者,并认为有必要进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号