...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine >Comparison the Outcomes of Open Thoracotomy and Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer
【24h】

Comparison the Outcomes of Open Thoracotomy and Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer

机译:比较开胸手术和微创胸腔镜食管切除术治疗食管癌的效果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Surgery is the first therapeutic option for esophageal cancer. There is controversy over the selection of the best surgical approach. Regarding this, the present study aimed to compare the minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in terms of their short-term outcomes and preoperative complications. Materials & Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 61 patients in Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran, within 2011-2013. The patients were assigned into two groups based on the type of therapeutic approach they received. The minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) groups consisted of 31 and 30 patients, respectively. For the purpose of the study, we collected such data as age, gender, site of lesion, bleeding, duration of surgery, rate of switch to open approach, post-operative morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and mortality rate. Results: According to the results of the study, 60.7% of the participants were male. The mean age of the patients was 62.39±11.91 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the site of lesion (P=0.014) and stage of tumor (P=0.108). No significant difference was observed between the MIE and OE groups in terms of the blood transfusion (P=0.981). Considering the complications, there was one case of fistula in the MIE group; furthermore, one and two cases of wound infection and pleural effusions were observed in the OE group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the post-operative complications, namely fistula, pleural effusions, and wound infection (P=0.492, P=0.238, and P=0.492, respectively). The MIE group had longer operation time (P≤0.001). There was one patient in the MIE group converted to open approach. The duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the OE group, and there was no mortality. Conclusion: As the findings of the present study demonstrated, the MIE outcomes were comparable with those of the OE with improved short-term outcomes.
机译:简介:手术是食道癌的第一种治疗选择。最佳手术方法的选择存在争议。关于这一点,本研究旨在比较微创和开放式食管切除术的近期疗效和术前并发症。材料与方法:该随机临床试验于2011-2013年在伊朗Mashhad的Ghaem医院进行,共61例患者。根据患者接受的治疗方法的类型将其分为两组。微创食管切除术(MIE)和开放式食管切除术(OE)组分别由31例和30例患者组成。出于研究目的,我们收集了以下数据:年龄,性别,病变部位,出血,手术时间,改开手术的比率,术后发病率,住院时间和死亡率。结果:根据研究结果,参与者中有60.7%是男性。患者的平均年龄为62.39±11.91岁。两组在病变部位(P = 0.014)和肿瘤分期(P = 0.108)之间无显着差异。在MIE和OE组之间,在输血方面没有观察到显着差异(P = 0.981)。考虑到并发症,MIE组有1例瘘管。此外,OE组分别观察到1例和2例伤口感染和胸腔积液。两组在术后并发症(即瘘管,胸腔积液和伤口感染)方面无显着差异(分别为P = 0.492,P = 0.238和P = 0.492)。 MIE组手术时间较长(P≤0.001)。 MIE组中只有一名患者转为开放入路。 OE组的住院时间明显更长,并且没有死亡率。结论:正如本研究的结果所表明的,MIE结局与OE结局相当,短期结局有所改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号