首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomolecular techniques :JBT. >Embracing Error: Using a Systems Approach to Improve Workflow and Workplace
【24h】

Embracing Error: Using a Systems Approach to Improve Workflow and Workplace

机译:拥抱错误:使用系统方法改善工作流程和工作场所

获取原文
       

摘要

Research cores are complex environments of highly skilled humans interacting with sophisticated instrumentation through multistep workflows. Cores often operate with significant constraints in staffing and resources and yet must consistently and efficiently deliver high-quality results to a wide range of customers. Mistakes and errors can be costly for both cores and researchers, and management of error risk is a critical component of core operation. A traditional view of error attributes adverse events primarily to individual misbehavior or frailty: forgetfulness, poor motivation, inattention, or noncompliance with established protocols. A response to error in the old model typically includes developing additional rules, adding automation, or administering disciplinary actions or training. These old-view solutions do not effect systematic improvement and are unlikely to reduce risk of future errors. A new view of error analysis accepts error as inevitable and systematically connected to the tools, tasks, and operational environment of the human actors. In a systems approach to error, complex systems are understood to force trade-offs between multiple conflicting goals. Safety improvements are developed at the systems or organizational and operational level from an understanding of mismatch between procedures and expected outcomes, and practice and actual results. Cores can create a climate of embracing error by establishing a reporting culture in which mishaps, near-misses, and small incidents are openly discussed without reprobation and blame. Using examples from other high-reliability organizations like nuclear power plants, air-traffic control centers, and hospital trauma units, cores can develop an approach to error analysis that avoids bad apple explanations, hindsight bias, cherry-picking, and mistake micromanagement. Cores can apply different accident models, collect human factors data, and develop real safety and reliability intelligence that leverages the creativity and intelligence of humans for a robust and resilient high-reliability organization. Articles from Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT are provided here courtesy of The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities.
机译:研究核心是高技能人员的复杂环境,可通过多步工作流程与复杂的仪器进行交互。核心人员通常在人员和资源上受到很大的限制,但必须始终如一地有效地为众多客户提供高质量的结果。错误和错误对核心人员和研究人员都可能造成巨大的损失,而错误风险的管理是核心操作的关键组成部分。对错误的传统观点主要将不良事件归因于个人的不良行为或脆弱:健忘,动力不足,注意力不集中或不遵守既定规程。对旧模型中的错误的响应通常包括制定其他规则,增加自动化或管理纪律处分或培训。这些旧的解决方案不会影响系统的改进,也不太可能降低将来发生错误的风险。错误分析的新观点认为错误不可避免,并且系统地将错误与人员的工具,任务和操作环境联系在一起。在错误的系统方法中,复杂的系统应理解为在多个相互冲突的目标之间进行折衷。通过对程序与预期结果之间的不匹配以及实践与实际结果之间的不匹配的理解,可以在系统或组织和运营级别上开发安全改进措施。核心人员可以通过建立一种报告文化来营造一种包容错误的氛围,在这种文化中,不幸,险恶和小事件都可以公开讨论,而不会受到指责。通过使用来自核电厂,空中交通管制中心和医院创伤部门等其他高可靠性组织的示例,核心可以开发一种错误分析方法,从而避免出现糟糕的苹果解释,事后偏见,挑剔和错误的微观管理。核心人员可以应用不同的事故模型,收集人为因素数据,并开发真正的安全性和可靠性情报,从而利用人员的创造力和智慧建立一个强大而有弹性的高可靠性组织。这里由生物分子资源设施协会提供了《生物分子技术杂志》上的文章:JBT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号