首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied mathematics >Comparative Study on Interface Elements, Thin-Layer Elements, and Contact Analysis Methods in the Analysis of High Concrete-Faced Rockfill Dams
【24h】

Comparative Study on Interface Elements, Thin-Layer Elements, and Contact Analysis Methods in the Analysis of High Concrete-Faced Rockfill Dams

机译:高混凝土面板堆石坝分析中界面元,薄层元和接触分析方法的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper presents a study on the numerical performance of three contact simulation methods, namely, the interface element, thin-layer element, and contact analysis methods, through the analysis of the contact behavior between the concrete face slab and the dam body of a high concrete-faced rockfill dam named Tianshengqiao-I in China. To investigate the accuracy and limitations of each method, the simulation results are compared in terms of the dam deformation, contact stress along the interface, stresses in the concrete face slab, and separation of the concrete face slab from the cushion layer. In particular, the predicted dam deformation and slab separation are compared with the in-situ observation data to classify these methods according to their agreement with the in-situ observations. It is revealed that the interface element and thin-layer element methods have their limitations in predicting contact stress, slab separation, and stresses in the concrete face slab if a large slip occurs. The contact analysis method seems to be the best choice whether the separation is finite or not.
机译:通过分析高面板混凝土面板与坝体之间的接触行为,研究了三种接触模拟方法的数值性能,即界面单元,薄层单元和接触分析方法。中国名为天生桥一号的混凝土面板堆石坝。为了研究每种方法的准确性和局限性,在坝变形,沿界面的接触应力,混凝土面板中的应力以及混凝土面板与垫层的分离方面对仿真结果进行了比较。特别是,将预测的大坝变形和板块分离与现场观测数据进行比较,以根据与现场观测结果的一致性对这些方法进行分类。结果表明,界面元法和薄层元法在预测接触应力,板坯分离以及如果发生大滑移时在混凝土面板中的应力方面存在局限性。无论间隔是否有限,接触分析方法似乎都是最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号