首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >The Prioritized Research Agenda for the Athletic Training Profession: A Report From the Strategic Alliance Research Agenda Task Force
【24h】

The Prioritized Research Agenda for the Athletic Training Profession: A Report From the Strategic Alliance Research Agenda Task Force

机译:运动训练专业优先研究议程:战略联盟研究议程工作组的报告

获取原文
       

摘要

Context Athletic trainers (ATs) must be equipped with evidence to inform their clinical practice. A systematic, inclusive, and continuous process for exploring research priorities is vital to the success of ATs and, more importantly, their patients' positive outcomes. Objective To identify research priorities and unify research with clinical practice to improve patient care and advance the profession. Design Mixed-methods study. Setting Focus groups and a Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants A total of 87 ATs (43 men [49.4%], 44 women [50.6%]; age = 40 ± 11 years; experience = 18 ± 11 years) participated in focus groups. Of the 49?332 e-mails sent, 580 were undeliverable, 5131 ATs started the survey (access rate = 10.5%), and 4514 agreed to participate (response rate = 9.3%). Main Outcome Measure(s) Our study consisted of 6 focus-group sessions, a content-expert review, and a Web-based survey. Themes from the focus groups were used to develop the research priorities and survey instrument. We used the 25-item validated survey to determine whether the research priorities and findings of the focus groups were generalizable. Endorsement of research priorities and recommendations was achieved when respondents indicated they agreed or strongly agreed. Results Respondents endorsed 5 research priorities: health care competency (n = 4438/4493, 98.8%), vitality of the profession (n = 4319/4455, 96.9%), health professions education (n = 3966/4419, 89.8%), health care economics (n = 4246/4425, 96.0%), and health information technology (n = 3893/4438, 87.7%). We also made the following recommendations: (1) develop funding initiatives that align with the agenda, (2) develop postdoctoral fellowships focused on clinical research, (3) facilitate collaborative relationships between clinicians and researchers, and (4) make research evidence more readily available and more applicable. Conclusions Using a systematic and inclusive process, we developed a prioritized research agenda for the athletic training profession. The agenda was endorsed by the leaders of each Strategic Alliance organization and adopted as the Athletic Training Research Agenda.
机译:背景运动训练员(AT)必须配备证据以告知其临床实践。探索研究重点的系统,包容和连续的过程对于AT的成功至关重要,更重要的是,AT患者的积极成果也至关重要。目的确定研究重点,并将研究与临床实践相结合,以改善患者护理水平并促进职业发展。设计混合方法研究。设置焦点小组和基于Web的调查。患者或其他参与者共有87位AT参与者(男性43位[49.4%],女性44位[50.6%];年龄= 40±11岁;经验= 18±11岁)参加了焦点组。在发送的49到332封电子邮件中,有580封邮件无法发送,有5131个AT发起了调查(访问率= 10.5%),有4514例同意参与(响应率= 9.3%)。主要结果指标我们的研究包括6个焦点小组会议,一个内容专家评论和一个基于Web的调查。焦点小组的主题被用于制定研究重点和调查工具。我们使用经过25个项目验证的调查来确定研究重点和焦点小组的发现是否可以推广。当受访者表示同意或强烈同意时,就获得了对研究重点和建议的认可。结果受访者认可了5个研究重点:卫生保健能力(n = 4438 / 4493,98.8%),职业活力(n = 4319 / 4455,96.9%),卫生职业教育(n = 3966 / 4419,89.8%),卫生经济学(n = 4246 / 4425,96.0%)和健康信息技术(n = 3893 / 4438,87.7%)。我们还提出了以下建议:(1)制定与议程相一致的资助计划;(2)开发专注于临床研究的博士后研究金;(3)促进临床医生和研究人员之间的合作关系;(4)使研究证据更容易可用且更适用。结论我们采用了系统的,包容的过程,为运动训练专业制定了优先研究议程。该议程得到每个战略联盟组织领导人的认可,并被采纳为运动训练研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号