首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics >Evaluation of major feed resources in crop-livestock mixed farming systems, southern Ethiopia: Indigenous knowledge versus laboratory analysis results
【24h】

Evaluation of major feed resources in crop-livestock mixed farming systems, southern Ethiopia: Indigenous knowledge versus laboratory analysis results

机译:埃塞俄比亚南部农作物-畜牧混合养殖系统中主要饲料资源的评价:土著知识与实验室分析结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Evaluation of major feed resources was conducted in four crop-livestock mixed farming systems of central southern Ethiopia, with 90 farmers, selected using multi-stage purposive and random sampling methods. Discussions were held with focused groups and key informants for vernacular name identification of feed, followed by feed sampling to analyse chemical composition (CP, ADF and NDF), in-vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), and correlate with indigenous technical knowledge (ITK). Native pastures, crop residues (CR) and multi-purpose trees (MPT) are the major feed resources, demonstrated great variations in seasonality, chemical composition and IVDMD. The average CP, NDF and IVDMD values for grasses were 83.8 (ranged: 62.9–190), 619 (ranged: 357–877) and 572 (ranged: 317–743) g kg^(?1) DM, respectively. Likewise, the average CP, NDF and IVDMD for CR were 58 (ranged: 20–90), 760 (ranged: 340–931) and 461 (ranged: 285–637)g kg^(?1) DM, respectively. Generally, the MPT and non-conventional feeds (NCF, Ensete ventricosum and Ipomoea batatas) possessed higher CP (ranged: 155–164 g kg^(?1) DM) and IVDMD values (611–657 g kg^(?1) DM) while lower NDF (331–387 g kg^(?1) DM) and ADF (321–344 g kg^(?1) DM) values. The MPT and NCF were ranked as the best nutritious feeds by ITK while crop residues were the least. This study indicates that there are remarkable variations within and among forage resources in terms of chemical composition. There were also complementarities between ITK and feed laboratory results, and thus the ITK need to be taken into consideration in evaluation of local feed resources.
机译:埃塞俄比亚中南部四个农作物-畜牧混合系统的主要饲料资源进行了评估,共有90名农民,采用多阶段的有目的性和随机抽样方法进行选择。与焦点小组和关键信息提供者进行了讨论,以确定饲料的白话名称,然后进行了饲料采样以分析化学成分(CP,ADF和NDF),体外干物质消化率(IVDMD)并与本地技术知识相关(ITK) )。天然牧场,农作物残留物(CR)和多用途树木(MPT)是主要的饲料资源,在季节性,化学成分和IVDMD方面表现出很大的差异。草的平均CP,NDF和IVDMD值分别为8 kg(DM-1)DM(619)(范围:357-877)和572(范围:317-743)和572(范围:317-743)。同样,CR的平均CP,NDF和IVDMD分别为58 gkg ^(?1)DM(58(范围:20-90),760(范围:340-931)和461(范围:285-637)g kg ^(?1)DM。通常,MPT和非常规饲料(NCF,Ensete ventricosum和Ipomoea batatas)具有较高的CP(范围:155–164 g kg ^(?1)DM)和IVDMD值(611–657 g kg ^(?1))。 DM),而NDF(331-387 g kg ^(?1)DM)和ADF(321-344 g kg ^(?1)DM)值较低。 MPT和NCF被ITK评为最佳营养饲料,而农作物残渣最少。这项研究表明,饲草资源内部和之中的化学成分存在显着差异。 ITK和饲料实验室结果之间也存在互补性,因此在评估本地饲料资源时需要考虑ITK。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号