...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. >Noninvasive Assessment of Stenotic Severity and Plaque Characteristics by Coronary CT Angiography in Patients Scheduled for Carotid Artery Revascularization
【24h】

Noninvasive Assessment of Stenotic Severity and Plaque Characteristics by Coronary CT Angiography in Patients Scheduled for Carotid Artery Revascularization

机译:计划行颈动脉血运重建的患者的冠状CT血管造影术对狭窄程度和斑块特征的非侵入性评估

获取原文

摘要

Aims: Coronary artery atherosclerosis in patients needing carotid revascularization has not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stenotic severity and plaque characteristics of coronary arteries by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients scheduled for carotid-artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: We performed coronary CTA after carotid ultrasound (US) in 164 patients (81.7% male, aged 68.1± 12.2 years) from 2014 to 2016. Of all, 70 were scheduled for CAS or CEA (CAS/CEA group) and 94 were not (non-CAS/CEA group). Carotid US and coronary CTA were compared for the evaluation of stenotic severity and plaque characteristics of each vessel between CAS/CEA and non-CAS/CEA groups. Results: Between the two groups, there were significant differences in the presence of significant stenosis (SS: ≥70% stenosis of coronary artery) (55.7% vs. 39.4%, P =0.038), triple-vessel disease (TVD)/left main trunk (LMT) (SS in each of three epicardial vessels and/or LMT) (24.3% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.0025), and high-risk plaque (HRP: positive remodeling and/or low attenuation) (55.7% vs. 24.5%, P <0.0001). CAS/CEA was independently associated with TVD/LMT (OR=2.30, 95%CI: 1.14–8.59, P =0.026) and HRP (OR=3.17, 95%CI: 1.57–6.54, P =0.0012) in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Similarly, vulnerable plaque (78.6% vs. 2.1%, P <0.0001) as well as severe stenosis of carotid artery (98.6% vs. 0%, P <0.0001) was seen more often in CAS/CEA than in non-CAS/CEA group. Conclusions: The prevalence of TVD/LMT and HRP determined by coronary CTA is higher in patients needing CAS/CEA than in those without. Management of systemic atherosclerosis is required in the perioperative period of CAS/CEA.
机译:目的:尚未完全阐明需要颈动脉血运重建的患者的冠状动脉粥样硬化。这项研究的目的是通过计划在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)或颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者中通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)评估冠状动脉的狭窄程度和斑块特征。方法:2014年至2016年,我们对164例患者(男性为81.7%,年龄为68.1±12.2岁)进行了颈动脉超声检查(US)后进行了冠状动脉CTA检查。CAS/ CEA(CAS / CEA组)计划中有70例接受了冠脉CTA检查不是(非CAS / CEA组)。比较颈动脉US和冠状动脉CTA评估CAS / CEA和非CAS / CEA组之间每个血管的狭窄严重程度和斑块特征。结果:两组之间存在显着狭窄(SS:≥70%冠状动脉狭窄)的存在显着差异(55.7%vs. 39.4%,P = 0.038),三支血管病变(TVD)/左主干(LMT)(三个心外膜血管和/或LMT中的每一个的SS)(24.3%vs.7.5%,P = 0.0025)和高危斑块(HRP:积极重塑和/或低衰减)(55.7% vs. 24.5%,P <0.0001)。在多变量Logistic回归中,CAS / CEA与TVD / LMT(OR = 2.30,95%CI:1.14–8.59,P = 0.026)和HRP(OR = 3.17,95%CI:1.57–6.54,P = 0.0012)独立相关分析。同样,与非CAS / CEA相比,在CAS / CEA中更容易看到斑块(78.6%比2.1%,P <0.0001)以及严重的颈动脉狭窄(98.6%vs. 0%,P <0.0001)。 CEA小组。结论:需要CAS / CEA的患者通过冠脉CTA测定的TVD / LMT和HRP的患病率高于没有CAS / CEA的患者。 CAS / CEA围手术期需要管理系统性动脉粥样硬化。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号