首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >A prospective randomized double-blind study comparing dexmedetomidine vs. combination of midazolam-fentanyl for tympanoplasty surgery under monitored anesthesia care
【24h】

A prospective randomized double-blind study comparing dexmedetomidine vs. combination of midazolam-fentanyl for tympanoplasty surgery under monitored anesthesia care

机译:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究,比较了右美托咪定与咪达唑仑-芬太尼联用在监测麻醉护理下进行鼓膜成形手术的情况

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Analgesia and sedation are usually required for the comfort of the patient and surgeon during tympanoplasty surgery done under local anesthesia. In this study, satisfaction scores and effectiveness of sedation and analgesia with dexmedetomidine were compared with a combination of midazolam-fentanyl. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients undergoing tympanoplasty under local anesthesia randomly received either IV dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg -1 over 10 min followed by 0.2 μg kg -1 h -1 infusion (Group D) or IV midazolam 0.06 mg kg -1 plus IV fentanyl 1 μg kg -1 over 10 min (Group MF) followed by normal saline infusion at 0.2 ml kg -1 h -1 . Sedation was titrated to Ramsay sedation score (RSS) of three. Vital parameters, rescue analgesics (fentanyl 1 μg kg -1 ) and sedatives (midazolam 0.01 mg kg -1 ), patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were recorded. Results: Patient and surgeon satisfaction score was better in Group D than Group MF (median interquartile range (IQR) 9 (8-10) vs. 8 (6.5-9.5) and 9 (8.5-9.5) vs. 8 (6.75-9.25), P = 0.0001 for both). Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group D were lower than the baseline values and the corresponding values in Group MF ( P 0.17). Seven patients in Group D had dry mouth vs. none in Group MF ( P = 0.006).One patient in Group D had bradycardia with hypotension which was effectively treated. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is comparable to midazolam-fentanyl for sedation and analgesia in tympanoplasty with better surgeon and patient satisfaction. Hemodynamics need to be closely monitored.
机译:背景:在局部麻醉下进行鼓膜成形手术期间,通常需要镇痛和镇静以使患者和外科医生感到舒适。在这项研究中,将右美托咪定与咪达唑仑-芬太尼联用的镇静和镇痛效果的满意度得分和有效性进行了比较。材料和方法:90名在局部麻醉下进行鼓膜成形术的患者在10分钟内随机接受静脉注射右美托咪定1μgkg -1 ,然后接受0.2μgkg -1 h -在10分钟内(MF组)进行1 输注(D组)或IV咪达唑仑0.06 mg kg -1 加IV芬太尼1μgkg -1 盐水以0.2 ml kg -1 h -1 输注。镇静被滴定为三分的拉姆齐镇静评分(RSS)。记录重要参数,急救镇痛药(芬太尼1μgkg -1 )和镇静剂(咪达唑仑0.01 mg kg -1 ),患者和外科医生的满意程度。结果:D组患者和外科医生的满意度得分均高于MF组(中四分位间距(IQR)9(8-10)vs. 8(6.5-9.5)和9(8.5-9.5)vs 8(6.75-9.25) ),两者均为P = 0.0001。 D组的术中心率和平均动脉压低于MF组的基线值和相应值(P 0.17)。 D组有7名患者口干,而MF组则无(P = 0.006).D组中1名患者患有低血压的心动过缓,可以得到有效治疗。结论:右美托咪定在鼓膜成形术中镇静和镇痛方面可与咪达唑仑-芬太尼相媲美,外科医生和患者的满意度更高。血流动力学需要密切监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号