首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development >THE ISSUE OF INCOME DIVERSIFICATION AMONG RURAL FARMING HOUSEHOLDS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM KWARA STATE, NIGERIA
【24h】

THE ISSUE OF INCOME DIVERSIFICATION AMONG RURAL FARMING HOUSEHOLDS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM KWARA STATE, NIGERIA

机译:农村农户收入多样化的问题:来自尼日利亚夸拉州的经验证据

获取原文
       

摘要

The rising incidences of poverty among rural farming families are the reason behind renewed interest in income diversification. This study determined the level of income diversification; identified alternative income sources; examined the reasons for diversification; and identified the constraints to diversification. A three-stage random sampling technique was used in selecting 160 households on which a structured interview schedule was administered. Descriptive statistics, a Likert-type scale, and the Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation were used for data analyses. Findings reveal that 1.3% of the households had no additional sources of income while 40.6% had at least four. Trading (55%) and livestock keeping (40.7%) were the most popular alternative income sources. The declining farm income (mean = 2.96) was the primary reason for diversification, while poor rural infrastructure (mean = 3.04) was the most severe constraint to income diversification. Farm size, access to extension services, household size, age and educational level of the household head were significantly related to the level of income diversification at p < 0.05. The study concluded that the level of income diversification was high and influenced by socioeconomic characteristics of the households. It recommends that the government should provide adequate infrastructural facilities in rural areas. Farmer associations should also ensure better prices for agricultural produce through joint marketing.
机译:农村农户贫困率的上升是人们对收入多样化重新产生兴趣的原因。这项研究确定了收入多样化的水平;确定替代收入来源;研究了多元化的原因;并确定了多元化的制约因素。采用三阶段随机抽样技术选择了160个实施结构化访谈时间表的家庭。描述性统计量,李克特型量表和皮尔逊产品矩相关性用于数据分析。调查结果显示,有1.3%的家庭没有其他收入来源,而40.6%的家庭至少有四个。贸易(55%)和畜牧业(40.7%)是最受欢迎的替代收入来源。农场收入的下降(平均数= 2.96)是多样化的主要原因,而农村基础设施差(平均数= 3.04)是限制收入多样化的最严重因素。农场规模,获得推广服务的机会,家庭规模,户主的年龄和受教育程度与收入多样化水平显着相关(p <0.05)。研究得出的结论是,收入多样化的水平很高,并受家庭社会经济特征的影响。建议政府在农村地区提供足够的基础设施。农民协会还应通过联合销售确保农产品价格更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号