首页> 外文期刊>Japanese heart journal >Long-Term Follow-Up After Angiographically Successful Coronary StentingDirect Stent Versus Conventional Stent Implantation
【24h】

Long-Term Follow-Up After Angiographically Successful Coronary StentingDirect Stent Versus Conventional Stent Implantation

机译:血管造影成功完成冠状动脉支架置入术后的长期随访直接支架置入术与常规支架置入术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of the study was to compare the impacts of angiographically successful direct stent implantation and conventional stent implantation (stent implantation following predilatation) on long-term major cardiac events. The authors prospectively studied 40 patients who had successful direct stent implantation and 46 patients who had successful conventional stent implantation. The end-point of the study was defined as the occurrence of a major cardiac event, including recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction, death, and target vessel revascularization. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups were similar, except the indication of percutaneous angioplasty, which was more frequently unstable angina in the conventional stent group (63% vs 38%, P: 0.03). Procedural minor complications were more frequent in conventional stent implantation, and there was also a positive correlation between the conventional stent implantation and procedural minor complications (r = 0.231, P: 0.03), and postprocedural troponin elevation (r = 0.221, P: 0.04). The incidences of major cardiac events including recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction, death, death or myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were not different between the study groups during the long-term follow-up period (21 ± 7.1 months for direct stent group and 20 ± 7.5 months for conventional stent group). Overall end-points occurred in 9 patients (22%) in the direct stent group and in 9 patients (19%) in the conventional stent group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no difference in event-free survival between the patients treated with direct stent implantation and conventional stent implantation (log-rank: 1.52, P = 0.21). Two-vessel intervention and hypertension were found to be related with long-term major cardiac events (r = 0.214, P: 0.048, r = 0.206, P: 0.04, respectively). In addition to the procedural advantages, direct stent implantation may also provide comparable results with conventional stent implantation concerning the late cardiac events following successful percutaneous coronary angioplasty.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较血管造影成功的直接支架植入和常规支架植入(预扩张后支架植入)对长期主要心脏事件的影响。作者前瞻性地研究了40例直接支架植入成功的患者和46例常规支架植入成功的患者。该研究的终点定义为发生重大心脏事件,包括复发性心绞痛,急性心肌梗塞,死亡和靶血管血运重建。除经皮血管成形术的适应症外,研究组的人口统计学和临床​​特征相似,在常规支架组中,不稳定型心绞痛的发生率更高(63%vs 38%,P:0.03)。常规支架置入术中的程序性小并发症更为常见,常规支架置入术与程序性小并发症(r = 0.231,P:0.03)和术后肌钙蛋白升高(r = 0.221,P:0.04)之间也呈正相关。 。长期随访期间(直接支架组为21±7.1个月),研究组之间主要的心脏事件(包括复发性心绞痛,急性心肌梗塞,死亡,死亡或心肌梗塞和靶血管血运重建)的发生率无差异常规支架组为20±7.5个月)。总的终点发生在直接支架组的9例患者(22%)和常规支架组的9例患者(19%)中。 Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,直接支架植入和常规支架植入患者的无事件生存率无差异(log-rank:1.52,P = 0.21)。发现两支血管介入和高血压与长期重大心脏事件有关(分别为r = 0.214,P:0.048,r = 0.206,P:0.04)。除了在程序上的优势外,直接支架植入术还可以提供与常规支架植入术类似的结果,这些结果涉及成功经皮冠状动脉血管成形术后发生的晚期心脏事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号